N.V.RAMANA
India Cements Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Chairman, APSERC, Hyderabad – Respondent
In this batch of writ petitions, the petitioners, who are High Tension (HT) electricity consumers, have called in question, the proceedings dated 05.06.2010, issued by A.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission, determining and approving the Fuel Surcharge Adjustment (FSA) for the financial year 2008, as illegal and arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of Regulation No.1 of 2003, Electricity Act, 2003, violative of principles of natural justice and the rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300-A of the Constitution of India.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
2. The undisputed facts that are necessary for disposal of this batch• of cases may be noted, and they run thus:
The petitioners being HT' electricity consumers entered into agreements with A.P. Transmission Corporation Ltd. (AP TRANSCO), for supply of electricity continuously. Pursuant to the said agreements, and the laws governing the supply of power, AP TRANSCO has been supplying power to the petitioners continuously, for meeting their requirements.
3. The State of Andhra Pradesh, in the process of electricity reforms, enacted A.P. Electricity Reform Act, 1998, for constitution of Electricity Regulatory Commission, restructuring
Vinod Seth v. Devinder Bajaj: 2010 (7) SCJ 493.
Whirlpool Corporation v. Registrar of Trade Marks
Harbanslal Sahnia v. Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd.: (2003) 2 SCC 107 = 2003 (3) ALT 2.2 (DN SC).
ABL International Ltd. v. Export Credit Guarantee Corpn. of India Ltd.: (2004) 3 SCC 553.
Mumtaz Post Graduate Degree College v. Vice Chancellor: (2009) 2 SCC 630.
Babu Verghese v. Bar Council of Kerala: (1999) 3 SCC 422.
Damodaran Pillai v. South Indian Bank Ltd.: 2005 (6) SCJ 589 = 2005 (6) ALT 42.3 (DN SC).
Union of India v. Cynamide India Ltd.: (1987) 2 SCC 720.
Rajasthan State Electricity Board
Mumtaz Post Graduate Degree College v. Vice Chancellor: (2009) 2 SCC 630 (Same as F.No.12).
Bahadursinh Lakhubhai Gohil v. Jagdishbhai M. Kamalia: AIR 2004 SC 1159.
U.P. State Spinning Co. Ltd. v. KS. Pandey: 2005 (8) SCJ 5 = 2006 (1) A LT 63 (DN SC).
Bihar State Electricity Board v. Pulak Enterprises: (2009) 5 SCC 641.
Bissa Stone Lime Co. v. Orissa State Electricity Board: (1976) 2 SCC 167.
Kerala S.E.B. v. S.N. Govinda Prabhu and Bros.: (1986) 4 SCC 198.
Union of India v. Cynamide India Ltd.: (1987) 2 SCC 720.
Hindustan Zinc Ltd. v. A.P.S.E.B.: (1991) 3 SCC 299.
Ashok Soap Factory v. Municipal Corpn. of Delhi: (1993) 2 SCC 37.
Bihar State Electricity Board v. Usha Martin Industries: (1997) 5 SCC 289.
BSES Ltd. v. Tata Power Co. Ltd.: (2004) 1 SCC 195.
Bihar State Electricity Board v. Pulak Enterprises
Cellular Operators Assn. of India v. Union of India: (2003) 3 SCC 186.
Clariant International Ltd. v. Securities & Exchange Board of India: (2004) 8 SCC 524.
Tharoo Mal v. Puran Chand Pandey: (1978) 1 SCC 102.
Shri Sitaram Sugar Co. Ltd. v. Union of India: (1990) 3 SCC 223.
PTC India Ltd. v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission: (2010) 4 SCC 603.
Association of Industrial Electricity Users v. State of A.P.: AIR 2002 SC 1361.
W.B. Electricity Regulatory Commn. v. CESC Ltd.: (2002) 8 SCC 715 (Same as F.No.20).
State of U.P. v. Mohd. Nooh: AIR 1958 SC 86.
A.V. Venkateshwaran v. R.S. Wadhwani: AIR 1961 SC 1506.
Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Chandan Nagar
Committee of Management v. Vice Chancellor: (2009) 2 SCC 630.
Prag Ice and Oil Mills v. Union of India: (1978) 3 SCC 459.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.