SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(AP) 325

B.CHANDRA KUMAR
Chagalamarri Subbaiah – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G. Srinivasulu Reddy

JUDGMENT

(1) This Revision Case has been filed by A-1 to A-3 against the Judgment, dated 22- 03-2004 in Crl.A.No.24 of 2001 passed by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Kadapa at Proddatur, whereby the Appeal filed by the petitioners was dismissed confirming the conviction and sentence passed by the I Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate in C.C.No.108 of 2000, dated 25-01-2001.

(2) ORIGINALLY the case was filed against A-1 to A-6. A-1 and A-3 were convicted for the offence under Section 324 of IPC and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-, in default to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of one month. A-2 was convicted for the offence under Section 324 of IPC and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months. A-2 was also convicted for the offence under Section 326 of IPC and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of one month. A-4 to A-6 were found not guilty and they were acquitted of the charges framed against them.

A-1 is the father of A-2 and husband of A-6. A-3 is the











































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top