HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
P. NAVEEN RAO, J.
P. Trivikrama Prasad & Others
Versus
Enforcement Directorate, Rep. by its Joint Director & Others
Writ Petition No. 21124 of 2014
Decided on : 16-10-2014
Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Section 5(1) –Equal shares - Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement Ministry of Finance Government of India passed order of provisional attachment of properties - Order of provisional attachment is assailed in this writ petition - Petition by Nava Bharat Projects Limited Nava Bharat Energy India Limited and Prasad, Director on Board of Nava Bharat Projects Limited and Nava Bharat Energy India Limited - company entered into power purchase agreement with Power Trading Corporation in January and entered into memorandum of understanding with Government of promised to provide cusecs of water from river – Held, Order passed by Supreme Court - As rightly contended by standing counsel for Enforcement Directorate that Supreme Court in its order dated directed that any prayer for stay or impeding progress in investigation/trial can be made only before Supreme Court and no other Court shall entertain - As defined in investigation includes all proceedings Act conducted by Enforcement Directorate for collection of evidence - Order of Supreme Court in do not come to the aid of the petitioner - Decisions of Supreme Court in also do not come to rescue of petitioner - It is not a case of observation - Supreme Court directed not to entertain any prayer for stay - It is not opposite to take note of fact that Supreme Court rendered judgment in holding allocation of all coal blocks as illegal including one allocated to petitioners – petition dismissed (Para 39)
1. In exercise of power vested by Section 5(1) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 ( Act 15 of 2010), (for short ‘the Act’), the Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, passed order of provisional attachment of the properties mentioned in para-29 of the order. One of the properties attached is 73,99,99,994 shares of Rs.2/-each of M/s. Nava Bharat Energy India Limited (NBEIL) for value of Rs.147,99,99,988/-. The order of provisional attachment is assailed in this writ petition by the Nava Bharat Projects Limited, Nava Bharat Energy India Limited and Sri P.Trivikrama Prasad, Director on Board of Nava Bharat Projects Limited and Nava Bharat Energy India Limited.
2. Nava Bharat Power Private Limited (NPPL) was promoted by Sri P.Trivikrama Prasad and Sri Y.Harichandra Prasad with equal shares. To achieve primary objective to generate power, the company entered into power purchase agreement with Power Trading Corporation (PTC) in January, 2006 and entered into memorandum of understanding with Government of Odisha. The Government of Odisha promised to provide 42 cusecs of water from river Brahmani. NPPL promised to supply 25% of the power generated to the State of Odisha. Mahanadi Coal Fields Limited issued letter of assurance for supply of 2.404 MTPA of “F” grade coal. NPPL signed power purchase agreement with GRIDCO, where under GRIDCO agreed to purchase 25% of the power generated by NPPL.
3. On 13.11.2006, advertisement was published on behalf of the Government of India, inviting companies to apply for allotment of coal blocks for captive utilization of power plants. On the same day, NPPL entered into memorandum of understanding with Globeleq Singapore Private Limited. On 23.11.2006, Odisha Government recommended name of NPPL for allocation of coal blocks for its power projects. By order dated 17.01.2008, the Ministry of Coal, Government of India, conveyed decision to allocate the coal blocks in Rampia and Dipside locations. Insofar as Rampia is concerned, petitioner is part of consortium of six companies. On 19.02.2008, joint venture company i.e., Rampia Coalmine Energy Private Limited was incorporated by the six consortium companies. In July, 2008, ESSAR Power Limited agreed to purchase entire share holding of NPPL for a consideration of Rs.169 crores.
4. Basing on a reference from the Central Vigilance Commission on allegations of corruption in the matter of allocation of coal blocks to private companies, the Central Bureau of Investigation registered FIR in RC 219/2012 E 0011 on 03.09.2012 under sections 120B and 420 of Indian Penal Code, Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act. On completion of investigation, CBI filed charge sheet No.1 dated 10.03.2014. Sri Y.Harish Chandra Prasad, P.Trivikrama Prasad and Nava Bharat Power Privte Limited are accused Nos. 1, 2 and 3 respectively.
5. Consequent to the registration of the crime by CBI, the Directorate of Enforcement issued ECIR/02/HYZO/2013, dated 22.07.2014 and initiated investigation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (Act, 2002) against M/s.NPPL and others. The Enforcement Directorate conducted detailed investigation. Having found in the investigation that the NPPL gave a mis-declaration regarding their net worth with an intention to get allotment of coal blocks, that after allotment of coal blocks, accused Nos.1 and 2 have offered to sell their equity on the same day i.e., 12.07.2010, that NPPL has not made any investment on plant and machinery and that value of tangible assets was very insignificant prior to allotment of coal blocks to get such high premium and no plant and machinery was installed in the project and no commercial production of electricity generated and, therefore, there was no consideration of the net worth of the company to get such high premium and thus the premium price was only on account of coal blocks allotment and such allotment was made based
The Commissioner of Sales Tax U.P. v. M/s. Bhagwan Industries (P) Ltd.
Sheo Nath Singh v. Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
T.R. Thandur v. Union of India & Others (1996) 3 SCC 690
Jasbir Singh v. Vipin Kumar Jaggi & Others (2001) 8 SCC 289
Msr. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India & Another (1978) 1 SCC 248
Mohinder Singh Gill and Anr. v. The Chief Election Commissioner
T.R. Thandur v. Union of India & Others (1996) 3 SCC 690
Jasbir Singh v. Vipin Kumar Jaggi & Others (2001) 8 SCC 289
Msr. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India & Another (1978) 1 SCC 248
State of Bihar v. Lal Krishna Advani & Others (2003) 8 SCC 361.
Aslam Mohammad Merchant v. Competent Authority & Others (2008) 14 SCC 186.
Raj Kumar Shivhare v. Assistant Director
United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tondon & Others (2010) 8 SCC 110
Commissioner of Income Tax & Others Vs. Chhabil Dass Agarwal (2014) 1 SCC 603
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.