SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(AP) 36

A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
Lakshmi Priya Exports (India) Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Ramalingam Mills Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:S. Subba Reddy, Advocate.
For the Respondents:K.G. Krishna Murthy, Senior Counsel, K.Ramamohan Mahadeva, Advocate.

Order:

1. These Civil Revision Petitions are being disposed of by this common order as they arise out of two suits, where the defendants were common. O.S.No.23 of 2007 was filed by M/s.Ramalingam Mills Ltd., seeking recovery of money against the defendants and O.S.No.31 of 2007 was filed by one Velu Yarn Traders seeking recovery of money against the same defendants in O.S.No.23 of 2007. When the suits were coming up for arguments, the plaintiffs filed two sets of four interlocutory applications in both the suits for reopening the suits, for receiving certain documents, and for recalling P.W.1 and D.W.1. All the applications were allowed by the learned III Additional District Judge, Tirupati, by two common orders dated 22.09.2014, challenging which, the defendants filed the above Civil Revision Petitions, and the details are as under:     

Sl.No.

C.R.P.No.

Filed against I.A.No.

I.A filed under the provisions of CPC

O.S.No.

1

3624 of 2014

999 of 2014

Section 151

23 of 2007

2

4068 of 2014

1000 of 2014

Order VII Rule 14(3) & S


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top