A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
Lakshmi Priya Exports (India) Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Ramalingam Mills Ltd. – Respondent
1. These Civil Revision Petitions are being disposed of by this common order as they arise out of two suits, where the defendants were common. O.S.No.23 of 2007 was filed by M/s.Ramalingam Mills Ltd., seeking recovery of money against the defendants and O.S.No.31 of 2007 was filed by one Velu Yarn Traders seeking recovery of money against the same defendants in O.S.No.23 of 2007. When the suits were coming up for arguments, the plaintiffs filed two sets of four interlocutory applications in both the suits for reopening the suits, for receiving certain documents, and for recalling P.W.1 and D.W.1. All the applications were allowed by the learned III Additional District Judge, Tirupati, by two common orders dated 22.09.2014, challenging which, the defendants filed the above Civil Revision Petitions, and the details are as under:
| Sl.No. | C.R.P.No. | Filed against I.A.No. | I.A filed under the provisions of CPC | O.S.No. |
| 1 | 3624 of 2014 | 999 of 2014 | Section 151 | 23 of 2007 |
| 2 | 4068 of 2014 | 1000 of 2014 | Order VII Rule 14(3) & S | |
Vadiraj Naggappa Vernekar v. Sharadchandra Prabhakar Gogate (2009) 4 SCC 410 – Relied.
Bada Bodaiah v. Bada Lingaswamy (2003 (1) ALD 790) – Relied.
Cable Corporation of India Limited, Bombay v. Sanghi Industries Limited
K.K.Velusamy v. N.Palanisamy (2011) 11 SCC 275) – Relied.
John Santiyago v. Clement Dass (2014 (2) ALD 184) – Relied.
G.Sanjeeva Reddy v. Indukuru Lakshmamma (2006 (3) ALT 66) – Relied.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.