M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
Gadamsetty Veeranjeneyulu – Appellant
Versus
Pokuru Ramaiah – Respondent
1. This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, by the unsuccessful petitioner–plaintiff, is directed against the order, dated 10.10.2017, of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Kanigiri, passed in I.A.No.695 of 2017 in O.S.No.32 of 2010.
2. I have heard the submissions of Sri V. Siva Prasad Reddy, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and of Sri L.J. Veera Reddy, learned counsel for the respondents. I have perused the material record.
3. The parties in this revision shall hereinafter be referred to as the plaintiff and defendants as arraigned in the suit.
4. The introductory facts, in brief, are as follows:
The plaintiff filed the suit against the defendants for perpetual injunction restraining the defendants and their men etcetera from interfering with the plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment over the plaint ‘B’ schedule property, which is shown as ‘CDEF’ vacant site in the plaint plan, and for costs. The 1st defendant filed a written statement and is resisting the suit. A Commissioner, who was appointed, filed his report. Before commencement of trial, the plaintiff filed the instant Interlocutory Application before the trial Court for permi
Abdul Rehman and another Vs. Mohd. Ruldu and others
Baldev Singh Vs. Manohar Singh
Chander Kanta Bansal Vs. Rajinder Singh
M. Kamalamma v. B. Doraswamy Reddy
North Eastern Railway Admn. Vs. Bhagwan Das
Pankaja and another Vs. Yellapa
Pirgonda Hongonda Patil v. Kalgonda Shidgonda Patil
Raghu Thilak D. John v. Rayappan and others
Revajeetu Builders Vs. Narayana Swamy
Rukhmabai v. Lala Laxminaraya and Ors.
Sampath Kumar Vs. Ayyakannu and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.