A. V. SESHA SAI
Zaggle Prepaid Ocean Services Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER :
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following reliefs:-
a) set aside any Notification of Award/Letter of Intent or signed Contract or any other such documents issued and/or executed between the Respondent No.1 and the Respondent No.2, if any;
b) Declare the process of the Respondent No.2 awarding tender of Implementation of Income Tax Law complaint Tax-exempted Meal Card system to the Respondent No.2 as illegal and arbitrary;
c) Direct the Respondent No.2 to cancel the tender process of Implementation of Income Tax Law Complaint Tax-exempt Meal Card system and issue fresh tenders’"
2. Visakhapatnam Steel Plant, respondent No.1 herein, issued a tender notice, vide NIT No.9800001660 dated 18.11.2020, inviting tenders from the reputed/experienced tenderers to provide requisite services for implantation of Income Tax Law Complaint Tax-exempt Meal Card System (MCS) for its employees. The period of contract is 30 months and the estimated value of the bus
Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. v. Nagpur Metro Rail Corpn. Ltd.
B.S.N. Joshi & Sons Ltd. v. Nair Coal Services Ltd.
Bakshi Security and Personnel Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Devkishan Computed Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
G.J.Fernandez v. State of Karnataka
Kanhaiya Lal Agrawal Vs. Union Of India And Others
Poddar Steel Corpn. v. Ganesh Engg. Works
Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India
A monetary penalty imposed by the RBI for non-compliance with regulatory guidelines does not constitute an adverse advisory or directive under a tender requirement prohibiting such directives.
Public authorities must ensure fairness and non-arbitrariness in tender processes, adhering to established eligibility criteria.
Tender - Tender conditions are required to be read as provided in the tender document and if there are two views or construction possible than the view of the authority interpreting the tender docume....
Court upheld that tender condition excluding bidders who applied for CDR is not arbitrary, ensuring public interest and project completion.
Judicial review in tender matters is limited; rejection based on non-compliance with tender conditions is not arbitrary.
Judicial review in tendering processes is limited; courts only interfere in cases of mala fides, arbitrariness, or if decisions are perverse.
The court emphasized the importance of fair and transparent decision-making in tender evaluations, asserting judicial review is warranted when actions of administrative bodies exhibit arbitrariness b....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.