IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
U. Durga Prasad Rao, J.
The Management of St.Mary Fathima Aided High School – Petitioner
Versus
The Government of A.P. – Respondent
Writ Petition No.15874 of 2021
Decided On : 31-01-2022
Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 14 and 21 - Indian Penal Code,1860 - Sections 120b, 463, 464, 420 r/w 34 - U.P Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 - Sections 7 and 14 - Cheating and dishonesty – The making of a false documents in the name of fictitious person - Alleged by the respondent Nos.5 and 6 that a registered will deed was executed by the said Sri Shanta Murthy - Respondent Nos.5 and 6 did not file any probate proceedings. However, they clandestinely got mutated the property in the Municipal records. The husbands of respondent Nos.5 and 6 are also working as teachers in the school. The correspondent of the petitioner made a representation dated 22.03.2021 with a request to grant renewal of recognition for the academic years 2022-2030, but 3rd respondent did not renew the recognition in view of the complaint of respondent Nos.5 and 6 - - respondent issued a notice expressing objections against the recognition of the petitioner’s institution. The correspondent made an application for renewal of recognition to the institution for the academic years 2024-2025 by submitting all the required documents - respondent authorities did not accord recognition in view of the complaint of respondent.
Finding of the Court:
Chief Executive Officer of the Authority resumes any site or building under sub-section (1) of Section 14, on his requisition, the Collector may cause the possession thereof to be taken from the transferee by use of such force as may be necessary and deliver the same to the Authority - makes it clear that if a lessee commits default in paying either the premium or the lease rent or other dues, or commits breach of any term of the lease deed or breach of any rules or regulations under the Act - Chief Executive Officer of Noida Authority can resume the leased plot or building in the manner provided in the statute, without filing a civil suit - respondent Nos.5 and 6 establish their title over the property and get eviction decree from the Court in O.S.No.1252/2019, they cannot complain to the official respondent Nos.1 to 4 not to renew the recognition or cancel the permission to the petitioner’s school on that sole ground. As already stated supra, it would be a different matter if the petitioner attains any disqualification under A.P. Education Act, 1982.
Result: Writ petition is disposed of.
ORDER :
Petitioner seeks writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondent Nos.1 to 4 in not granting renewal of the recognition to the petitioner’s institution for academic years 2021-31 by relying on false complaint of respondent Nos.5 and 6 stating that suit O.S.No.1252/2019 filed by them is pending, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and for a consequential direction to the official respondents to grant renewal of recognition for the academic years 2021-31.
2. The petitioner’s case succinctly is thus:
(b) The correspondent’s father Sri Shanta Murthy had three children and he purchased the present building in the name of society and it was alleged by the respondent Nos.5 and 6 that a registered will deed dated 29.12.2015 was executed by the said Sri Shanta Murthy. He passed way on 18.07.2017. The respondent Nos.5 and 6 did not file any probate proceedings. However, they clandestinely got mutated the property in the Municipal records. The husbands of respondent Nos.5 and 6 are also working as teachers in the school. The correspondent of the petitioner made a representation dated 22.03.2021 with a request to grant renewal of recognition for the academic years 2022-2030, but 3rd respondent did not renew the recognition in view of the complaint of respondent Nos.5 and 6. Hence, the writ petition.
3. Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 filed counter and opposed the writ petition contending thus:
Sub-section (2) provides that where the Chief Executive Officer of the Authority resumes any site or building under sub-section (1) of Section 14, on his requisition, the Collector may cause the poss....
Point of law: If a lessee commits default in paying either the premium or the lease rent or other dues, or commits breach of any term of the lease deed or breach of any rules or regulations under the....
The court established that a party must demonstrate a legally protected interest to have standing in a writ petition, emphasizing the principle of locus standi in educational disputes.
The use of Kahcharie/Shamilat land for private schools is illegal, and amendments to education rules are prospective, requiring schools to operate on proprietary land.
Withdrawal of recognition of educational institutions must follow due process and principles of natural justice, ensuring the institution is given an opportunity to respond to allegations.
The withdrawal of recognition must be based on compliance with recognition parameters, and educational institutions should be afforded a reasonable opportunity to rectify any deficiencies before such....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.