Back
GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
Raveendra E. M. School Rep by its Correspondent Sri Chalamcharla – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard Sri Sri Vijay Mathukumilli, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners; Sri L.V.S Nagaraju, learned Government Pleader for School Education; Sri B. Satyendra Mani Kumar, Assistant Government Pleader for School Education for the Official Respondents and Sri Venkateswara Rao Gudapati, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Kilaru Nithin Krishna, learned Counsel for the Respondent No.5.
2. Prayer sought in the Writ Petition is as under:
The court established that a party must demonstrate a legally protected interest to have standing in a writ petition, emphasizing the principle of locus standi in educational disputes.
Sub-section (2) provides that where the Chief Executive Officer of the Authority resumes any site or building under sub-section (1) of Section 14, on his requisition, the Collector may cause the poss....
The principle of forum non conveniens allows courts to decline jurisdiction if a more appropriate forum exists, particularly in education-related disputes where the School is located outside the cour....
Education Law - Non-payment of fees - Mere presence of CBSE as a respondent in petition is not sufficient to enable this Court to exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution. The Court ma....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that an order passed without jurisdiction is a nullity and cannot sustain in the eye of the law.
The establishment of educational institutions must comply with statutory provisions, ensuring local educational needs are assessed to prevent unhealthy competition.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
