C. PRAVEEN KUMAR, RAVI NATH TILHARI
JOGI VENKATESWARAMMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF AP REP BY ITS PP HYD. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
C. Praveen Kumar, J.
Criminal Appeal No.366 of 2013 is filed by A.3; Criminal Appeal No.376 of 2013 is filed by A.4; while Criminal Appeal No.404 of 2013 is filed by A.1 and A.2. Since all the three appeals arise out of one judgment, the same are heard and disposed of by this common judgment.
2. These three appeals are filed against the judgment dated 12.04.2013 passed in Sessions Case No.159 of 2006, on the file of learned Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, wherein A.1 and A.2 were tried for the offences punishable under Sections 302 r/w. Section 34, 404, 201 and 411 IPC; A.1 to A.3 for the offences punishable under Sections 120-B r/w.Section 302 IPC for conspiring to commit murder of one Balabommala Ashok and A.4 for the offence punishable under Section 419 r/w.120-B IPC for impersonation as husband of A.3.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.