IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
R. Raghunandan Rao, J.
Bhavani Mahila Trust (BMT), Rep. by its Chairperson, Pamulapati Padmavathi - Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj & Rural Development Department, Secretariat of A.P. & Others - Respondent
W.P. No. 1402 of 2022
Decided On : 05-05-2022
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 14, 21 and 300-A - Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Section 58, 98 and 103 - Right To Fair Compensation And Transparency In Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation And Resettlement Act, 2013 - Illegal demolition of tiled house - Registered deed of settlement – Notice - Seeking directed 2nd respondent to survey entire land and submit a report to this Court by next date of hearing as to whether house had been demolished by 5th respondent or not – The tiled house in occupation of petitioner has been demolished illegally and once this Court has given a finding that demolition was illegal, both procedurally and substantively, petitioner would be entitled to be restored back to same position as was obtaining prior to demolition. (Para 23)
Finding of the Court: once this Court has given a finding that the demolition was illegal, both procedurally and substantively, the petitioner would be entitled to be restored back to the same position as was obtaining prior to the demolition. This would mean that tiled house of petitioner has to be reconstructed and the equipment and material of the petitioner which has been removed from the said tiled house would have to be returned to petitioner. In event of any damage to the said material, the petitioner would be entitled to be compensated for the loss caused due to such demolition.
Result: Writ petition is disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
The case of the petitioner is:-
(a) Smt. Late Nagandla Sambrajyam established Bhavani Mahila Mandali, in Peda kakani Mandal, Guntur District for upliftment of woman and girl child in 1967.
(b) The father of Smt. Late Nagandla Sambrajyam was the owner of various extents of land in the village including Ac.0.54 cents in Sy.No.560 of the village.
(c) He had settled this land along with other extents of land in favour of his son late Sri Nagandla Surya Narayana by way of a registered deed of settlement dated 17.02.1945.
(d) Upon demise of Sri Nagandla Surya Narayana, the said property, which included a tiled house in Ac.0.06 cents in Sy.No.560, devolved upon his daughter Smt. Late Nagandla Sambrajyam. This tiled house was dedicated to the Bhavani Mahila Mandali right from its inception 1967.
(e) After her demise, the deponent of the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition (hereinafter referred to as the Deponent) took charge and continued to run the said Bhavani Mahila Mandali. A deed of trust was also executed and registered before the Sub-Registrar, Pedakakani on 21.07.2014 showing that the office of the Trust was at D.No.1-111, Pathuru situated in an extent of Ac.0.06 cents in Sy.No.560.
(f) The said tiled house is said to have been used for carrying out various activities for the development of women and girls in the area and photographs showing such activities have also been filed along with the writ petition.
(g) On 12.01.2022, the 5th respondent pasted a notice dated 06.01.2022 in Rc.No.3/2022, issued under sections 58, 98 (10, 103 (60 read with G.O.Ms.No.188, dated 21.07.2011, stating that the Bhavani Mahila Mandali is being run in Sy.No.557 of Pedakakani village and since the said land was proposed to be used for construction of a library, the Bhavani Mahila Mandali was required to vacate the building within three days, failing which the land would be taken over.
(h) The petitioner Trust, upon coming to know of this notice informed the 5th respondent that the Bhavani Mahila Mandali was running in a private property and not in the Government land and requested the 5th respondent not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner-Trust.
(i) On 17.01.2022, the 5th respondent sought to demolish the building by using a JCB. At this stage, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of the present writ petition.
2. By the time the matter came up before the Court on 21.01.2022, the tiled house was demolished and the material and assets of the petitioner, including computers etc., were taken away by the 5th Respondent. This Court on 21.01.2022, directed the 2nd respondent to survey the entire land in Sy.No.560 and 557 of Pedakakani village and Mandal and submit a report to this Court by the next date of hearing as to whether the house bearing D.No.1-111 in Sy.No.560 of Pedakakani Village had been demolished by the 5th respondent or not. The report, filed by the 2nd respondent, will be considered in the course of this judgment.
3. After the demolition of the building, the Petitioner amended its prayer and sought a declaration that the action of the 5th respondent in demolishing the tiled house of the petitioner, as arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and for a consequential direction to the respondents either to restore possession of the property to the petitioner by constructing or by directing the respondent to pay compensation by initiating land acquisition proceedings under the Right To Fair Compensation And Transparency In Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation And Resettlement Act, 2013.
4. The 5th respondent-Gram Panchayat filed a counter, stating thus:
(A) A request arose from the villagers for setting up a library in the place of the tiled house in Sy.no.557. On this request a gram sabha meeting was held on 07.10.2021, where a resolution was for construction of a library in the government site. Pursuant to this resolution, the Gram Panchayath also passed a resolution on
Banne Gandhi and Ors., vs. District Collector, Ranga Reddy District and Ors.
Any property of Panchayat is under occupation of any other person, a notice would be served on party concerned and said party would be given a hearing before a proceeding for eviction.
The construction of a Grama Sachivalayam building at a new location without conducting a Gramasabha and obtaining approval of the works under the MGNREG scheme is illegal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.