Back
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Morusupalli Raghavendra Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Endowments Department – Respondent
ORDER :
This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner invoking jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief :
The Executive Officer of a religious institution or endowment, whose annual income exceeds ten lakhs rupees, has the exclusive jurisdiction and power to deal with the office holders and servants of t....
suspension must be a step in aid to the ultimate result of the investigation or inquiry. The authority also should keep in mind public interest of the impact of the delinquent’s continuance in office....
Administrative powers of a religious institution trustee are subject to statutory supervision. Boards cannot appoint executive officers indefinitely, nor can trustees create non-sanctioned posts. App....
The appointment of non-hereditary trustees is valid under the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act when there is evidence of mismanagement by hereditary trustees, and full legal procedures a....
The Commissioner lacked authority to appoint an Executive Officer for temple administration, violating established law and trustee rights under the HR & CE Act.
The appointment of an Archaka is a secular act and hence, the hereditary right cannot be claimed.
Executive Officer empowered under HR&CE Act Rule 14 to implement disciplinary actions; failure to prove enquiry participation upholds dismissal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
