SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Dhanekula Vara Prasad S/o Paparao – Appellant
Versus
Bobba Anitha W/o Siva Prakash – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Plaintiffs in the suit filed the above revision against the order dated 07.04.2022 in C.M.A. No. 10 of 2020 on the file of V Additional District Judge, Vijayawada reversing the order dated 17.03.2020 in I.A. No. 683 of 2019 in O.S. No. 2039 of 2019 on the file of III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Vijayawada.
2. Plaintiffs filed suit O.S. No. 2039 of 2019 against the defendant seeking perpetual injunction.
3. The case of the plaintiffs, in brief, is that Dhanekula Sitaramaiah and Dhanekula Paparao are father and son; that said Sitaramaia and Paparao partitioned their ancestral properties on 18.01.1940 and the same was registered; that out of said partition, total extent of Ac. 6.04 cents in R.S. No. 368/3 fell to the share of Paparao; that said Paparao sold away Ac. 1.56 cents to one Tullimilli Kotaiah and also sold away Ac. 1.24 cents; that remaining extent of Ac. 3.24 cents, vacant site, is in possession and enjoyment of said Paparao; that Paparao blessed with five sons and one daughter; that one son Dhanekula Bhaskararao died intestate on 04.03.2016 leaving behind him his wife, 3rd plaintiff and daughters, plaintiffs 4 and 5 as his legal heirs; that another son Dhanekula
Estralla Rubber vs. Dass Estate (P) Ltd. (2001) 8 SCC 97
Gujarat Bottling Company Limited vs. Coca Cola Company Limited
Kashi Math Samsthan vs. Shrimad Sudhindra Thirtha Swamy
Printers (Mysore) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Pothan Joseph
R. Parijatham vs. M. Kameshwari
Seema Arshad Zaheer vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.