SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Boya Kistamma – Appellant
Versus
Boya Suri – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Sri Pardha Saradhi A.V., Advocate
For the Respondent:Sri Tota Tejeswara Rao, Advocate

ORDER

Defendants in the suit filed the above revision assailing the order, dated 16.06.2025, in C.M.A.No.01 of 2025 on the file of learned I Additional District Judge, Srikakulam, preferred against the order dated 25.09.2023 in I.A.No.39 of 2023 in O.S.No.58 of 2023, on the file of learned I Additional Civil (Junior Division), Srikakulam.

2. The parties to the revision are referred to as per their status in the suit O.S.No.58 of 2023.

3. The plaintiff filed suit O.S.No.58 of 2023 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Srikakulam, seeking perpetual injunction against the defendants. Along with the suit, the plaintiff filed I.A.No.39 of 2023 under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short C.P.C. ), seeking an ad-interim injunction.

4. In the affidavit, filed in support I.A.No.39 of 2023, it was pleaded that the plaintiff s father had an ancestral property in the village and plaintiff possesses land of an extent of Ac.00-52 cents, Ac.00-71 cents and Ac.00-30 cents, in survey Nos.43-1-A-2, 4-3-A and 4-3-A, respectively (totalling Ac.1-53 cents). The plaint/petition schedule property consists of two items i.e. item No.1 is land of an extent of Ac.00

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top