Back
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Gundluru Sreenivasulu, S/o Late Subbachari – Appellant
Versus
Gundluru Bhagyamma, W/o Late Subramanyam Achari – Respondent
ORDER :
Defendant Nos.5 and 6 in the suit filed the present civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India aggrieved by order, dated 10.03.2022 passed in I.A.No.35 of 2022 in O.S.No.52 of 2009 on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge, Piler.
2. Respondent herein being the plaintiff filed O.S.No.52 of 2009 on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge, Piler, to declare that plaintiff has got right and title over 3/4th share in ‘A’schedule properties and half share in ‘B’ schedule properties and to partition and deliver possession of the same etc.
3. In the plaint, plaintiff contended inter alia that she is wife and defendant No.1 in the suit is mother of deceased Subramanyam Achari; that ‘A’ schedule properties are ancestral and joint family properties of Subramanyam Achari and his son Nagendra; that both are having half share; that Nagendra, died intestate, unmarried, on 18.05.1994 leaving behind him the plaintiff as sole legal heir; that plaintiff succeeded to his half share in ‘A’ schedule properties; that Subramanyam Achari, husband of the respondent/plaintiff died intestate on 24.07.1996 leaving behind the plaintiff and defendant No.1 in the suit as his legal
A court has the discretion to grant leave to a party to file documents under Order VIII Rule 1A(3) C.P.C., even if they were not filed along with the written statement, provided that the party provid....
The court established that compliance with procedural rules regarding the introduction of evidence is essential, and failure to seek leave to file documents can result in their exclusion.
The court established that procedural delays should not prevent the introduction of relevant evidence, prioritizing substantial justice.
The court upheld the dismissal of a petition to introduce documents after cross-examination, emphasizing adherence to procedural rules under CPC.
It is well settled principle that in case ‘sufficient cause’ is shown for filing the documents at the hearing of the suit and/or at the end of the trial, such cause shown should receive a liberal con....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
