ORDER :

1. The sole plaintiff before the trial Court filed this civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India questioning the correctness of order dated 12.06.2019 of learned Junior Civil Judge, Mummidivaram in I.A. No. 128 of 2019 in O.S. No. 114 of 2007. He is aggrieved because of the fact that under the impugned order, learned trial Court granted leave for defendant No. 6 in the suit in filing certain documents. Defendant No. 6 in the suit is respondent No. 1 in this revision. Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 are rest of the defendants in the suit.

2. This revision petitioner filed O.S. No. 114 of 2007 stating that the suit schedule property belongs to Sri Gopala Krishna and he died. Defendant No. 2 is his wife and defendant Nos. 3 and 4 are his daughters and plaintiff is his son. Therefore, the suit property shall be divided into four shares and grant him one share. Plaint further shows that defendant No. 1 is a woman in illegal intimacy with late Gopala Krishna. Gopala Krishna purchased one of the items of the suit schedule property in the name of that woman. Plaint further shows that defendant No. 5 in the suit claimed to have purchased another one item of the su