Back
V. R. K. KRUPA SAGAR
Yallamilli Venu Mohan – Appellant
Versus
Kona Venkata Srinivasa Rao – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The sole plaintiff before the trial Court filed this civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India questioning the correctness of order dated 12.06.2019 of learned Junior Civil Judge, Mummidivaram in I.A. No. 128 of 2019 in O.S. No. 114 of 2007. He is aggrieved because of the fact that under the impugned order, learned trial Court granted leave for defendant No. 6 in the suit in filing certain documents. Defendant No. 6 in the suit is respondent No. 1 in this revision. Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 are rest of the defendants in the suit.
2. This revision petitioner filed O.S. No. 114 of 2007 stating that the suit schedule property belongs to Sri Gopala Krishna and he died. Defendant No. 2 is his wife and defendant Nos. 3 and 4 are his daughters and plaintiff is his son. Therefore, the suit property shall be divided into four shares and grant him one share. Plaint further shows that defendant No. 1 is a woman in illegal intimacy with late Gopala Krishna. Gopala Krishna purchased one of the items of the suit schedule property in the name of that woman. Plaint further shows that defendant No. 5 in the suit claimed to have purchased another one item of the su
A court has the discretion to grant leave to a party to file documents under Order VIII Rule 1A(3) C.P.C., even if they were not filed along with the written statement, provided that the party provid....
The court established that procedural delays should not prevent the introduction of relevant evidence, prioritizing substantial justice.
Timely submission of documents and the requirement for sufficient cause to be shown for their delayed filing are crucial principles in civil procedure.
The duty of the defendant to produce relevant documents in court and the importance of fair trial procedures.
The court upheld the trial Court's dismissal of applications to introduce documents due to lack of valid grounds for delay, affirming the importance of timely evidence submission under procedural rul....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court may not permit the filing of additional documents at a belated stage if it would only protract the case, as established by the princ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
