IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
A.V. RAVINDRA BABU, J.
V. Appanna and Others - Appellants
Versus
State, Rep. by P.P., High Court of A.P., Hyderabad - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 568 of 2009
Decided On : 14-11-2022
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 323, 324 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 313, 228, 235 (1) – Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 – Section 3(1)(x), 3(1)(x)(xi) – Default to suffer simple imprisonment – Punishment for voluntarily causing hurt – Voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons – Frame a charge – Judgment of acquittal or conviction – Criminal Appeal – Appellants faced trial in said case for charges under Section 3(1)(x) of SCs & STs (POA) Act and Section 323 of IPC and learned Special Judge acquitted present appellants of offences alleged under Section 3(1)(x) of SCs & STs (POA) Act, but convicted them under Section 323 of IPC – Held, Court has discretion to impose sentence of imprisonment or fine or both – There is no dispute that accused pleaded mercy before trial Court and trial Court declined to give benefits under Probation of Offenders Act – Contention of appellants is that due to their advancement of age, it is not desirable to keep them in prison, as offence that was proved by prosecution is under Section 323 of IPC – It is a case where according to prosecution at time of date of offence, First appellant (A4), second appellant (A5) and third appellant (A6) was aged a period is expired subsequent to date of offence – So, at present appellants (A.4 to A.6) are in age group respectively – Court of considered view, that it is desirable, in ends of justice, to convert sentence imposed against appellants by trial Court as that of fine – Appeal allowed.
JUDGMENT :
This is a Criminal Appeal filed on behalf of the Appellants/Accused Nos.4 to 6 in S.C.No.8 of 2008 (Old S.C.No.18 of 2007), on the file of the Special Judge for Trial of SCs & STs (POA) Act, 1989, Srikakulam, questioning the judgment, dated 29.04.2009, where under the learned Special Judge for Trial of SCs & STs (POA) Act, 1989, Srikakulam, found the present appellants guilty of the offence under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code (“IPC” for short) and sentenced them to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of six months each and to pay fine of Rs.500/- each in default to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of 15 days.
2. The present appellants faced trial in the said case for the charges under Section 3(1)(x) of SCs & STs (POA) Act and Section 323 of IPC and the learned Special Judge acquitted the present appellants of the offences alleged under Section 3(1)(x) of SCs & STs (POA) Act, but convicted them under Section 323 of IPC and sentenced them as above.
3. The case of the prosecution before the trial Court according to the charge sheet filed by the State, represented by the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Palaknonda in Crime No.9 of 2007 under Section 324 r/w 34 of IPC and Sections 3(1)(x)(xi) of SCs & STs (POA) Act, 1989 is as follows :
(i) The defacto-complainants L.W.1-Deesari Satyamdora, L.W.2-Deesari Gademma and L.W.3-Jalumuru Guramma are residents of Madhavarayapuram Village of Santhakaviti Mandal. They belonged to ST-Konda Dora by caste. The accused Gulivindala Krishna and 9 others are residents of the same village and belonged to Kapu community.
(ii) The complainants L.W.1-Deesari Satyamdora, L.W.2-Deesari Gademma and L.W.3-Jalumuru Guramma, all are Scheduled Tribes. They reported that they along with others are engaged as coolies for forming of new gravel road in front of the house of Girada Swamy Naidu. While attending their coolie works, accused Gulivindala Krishna, Chowdari Yerramnaidu and Chowdari Suryanarayana came one after another and abused L.W.1-Deesari Satyam Dora in filthy language. A.4 caught hold of his mother i.e., L.W.2-Deesari Gademma’s hand, A.5 caught hold of her tuft of hair and dragged her on the ground and A.6 abused her in filthy language. A.7, A.8, A.9 and A.10 caught hold of her tuft of hair, dragged on ground and abused in filthy language by touching her caste name. They pushed her down, as such, she received injuries. Konchada Simhachalam, one of the accused, placed his towel around the neck of L.W.3-Jalumuru Guramma and abused her by touching her caste name. Basing on the report, L.W.12 registered a crime and investigated into. The Superintendent of Police, Srikakulam has appointed Sub-Divisional Police Officer, as investigating officer. L.W.14-Sub-Divisional Police Officer took the investigation from L.W.12. He visited the scene of offence and recorded the statements of witnesses. He obtained caste certificates of L.Ws.1 to 3 from L.W.10. He examined the scene of offence in the presence of mediators. The Medical Officer-L.W.11 examined the injured and issued wound certificates. The injured were referred to hospital after registration of F.I.R. by L.W.11. The investigation reveals that Accused Nos.1 to 10 are responsible for abusing and insulting L.Ws.1 to 3 in the name of their caste. Hence, the charge sheet.
4. The learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Rajam, took cognizance and committed the case to the Court of Sessions and thereafter it was numbered as S.C.No.8 of 2008. On appearance of the accused before the trial Court and after following the procedure under Section 228 of Code of Criminal Procedure (“Cr.P.C.” for short), charges under Section 3(1)(x) of SCs & STs (POA) Act against accused Nos.1 to 10, charge under Section 3(1)(xi) of the said Act against Accused Nos.4, 5, 6, 9 and 10 and further charges under Section 323 r/w 34 of IPC against Accused Nos.1 to 3 and 7 and 8 and further charge under Section 3 (1)(xi) of the said Act against the Accused Nos.1 to 3,
SupremeToday
Intention to insult based on caste must be established for conviction under Section 3(1)(x) of the S.C. & S.T. (PoA) Act; the absence of such intent results in acquittal.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the prosecution must prove the intention to outrage the modesty of a victim to sustain a charge under Section 3(1)(xi) of S.Cs & S.Ts (POA) Ac....
The conviction of the appellants for assault was upheld, while they were acquitted of charges under the SC & ST Act due to lack of proof of the victim's caste.
Court emphasized the need for consistent witness testimonies to sustain convictions under SC/ST Act and recognized the importance of specific attribution of actions to the accused in assault cases.
The court held that reliance on inconsistent and insufficient witness testimonies, alongside lack of medical evidence for grievous injuries, invalidates the conviction, necessitating acquittal.
Prosecution must prove charges under the SCs & STs Act beyond reasonable doubt; unexplained delay in lodging FIR can undermine case credibility.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.