Back
A. V. RAVINDRA BABU
Thammisetty Narayana @ Pedda Narayana – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. – Respondent
ORDER :
This Criminal Revision Case came to be filed by the petitioners, who are the Accused Nos.1, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12 and 13, in Sessions Case No.10 of 2002, on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Markapur and who are the appellants in Criminal Appeal No.153 of 2004, before the learned II Additional District & Sessions Judge (FTC), Ongole at Prakasam Division, challenging the judgment in the said Criminal Appeal, dated 08.02.2006, whereunder the learned II Additional District & Sessions Judge (FTC), Ongole, allowed the appeal in part exonerating the petitioners for the offence under Section 148 of Indian Penal Code (“I.P.C.” for short) and confirmed the sentence imposed against them by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Markapur, dated 13.10.2004, as regards the punishment under Section 324 of I.P.C.
2. The petitioners faced trial in S.C.No.10 of 2002 before the Assistant Sessions Judge, Markapur, on various charges and the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Markapur, found them guilty of the charges under Sections 148 and 324 of I.P.C. and accordingly, after questioning them, convicted and sentenced them to pay fine of Rs.500/- each, in default to suffer simple imprisonment for one mo
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on consistent witness testimony, medical evidence, and lack of glaring inconsistency between ocular and medical evidence to determine ....
The main legal point established is the reliance on victim testimony, medical evidence, and circumstantial witnesses to support the conviction for assault offences, and the court's exercise of revisi....
The reliability of prosecution witnesses' evidence and the consideration of minor contradictions in the evidence as immaterial in accepting the case of the prosecution.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for reliability and consistency in witness testimonies and evidence presented by the prosecution to establish guilt beyond reasonable doub....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of evidence provided by prosecution witnesses, the nature and gravity of the offences committed, and the petitioners' age and cri....
Point of Law : Section 134 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 made it clear the number of witnesses are not criteria, but quality of evidence and not quantity of evidence. Further, it is made clear that me....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
