Back
A. V. RAVINDRA BABU
Gudugunturi Rama Rao @ Goduguluri Rama Rao S/o Yogaiah – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. Rep. by the Public Prosecutor – Respondent
ORDER :
This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioner, who was the appellant in Criminal Appeal No.11 of 2008, on the file of VI Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Markapur, Prakasam District (“Additional Sessions Judge” for short), challenging the judgment, dated 31.03.2009, whereunder the learned Additional Sessions Judge, dismissed the Criminal Appeal modifying the sentence of imprisonment imposed against the appellant before the Assistant Sessions Judge, Darsi in S.C.No.303 of2007 as that of Section 324 of Indian Penal Code (“I.P.C.” for short) from that of Section 307 of I.P.C. for causing injuries to P.W.1, as such, sentenced the appellant to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for three months and sustained the conviction and sentence imposed against the accused before the Court below under Section 324 of I.P.C. insofar as causing injuries to P.W.2 is concerned.
2. The parties to this Criminal Revision Case will hereinafter be referred to as described before the trial Court for the sake of the convenience.
3. The Sessions Case No.303 of 2007, on the file of Assistant S
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on consistent witness testimony, medical evidence, and lack of glaring inconsistency between ocular and medical evidence to determine ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on credible testimony of prosecution witnesses and medical evidence to establish guilt, and the non-fatal nature of non-seizure of the....
: CONVICTION UPHELD – ACCUSE did not come with the weapon, spade with a pre-plan and he picked up the weapon from the person who was working in the field, only after such quarrel. Considering the sai....
The court upheld the conviction and sentence based on unassailable evidence, despite discrepancies in the prosecution's case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on corroborative evidence, including witness testimony and medical evidence, to establish guilt under the relevant sections of the Ind....
The court emphasized the special status of injured witnesses and affirmed the need for corroboration in cases involving motive from disputes.
The appellate court must show compelling reasons to overturn an acquittal, and mere witness testimony without corroboration is insufficient to establish intent for assault.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
