JUDGMENT :

Heard Sri Nani Babu Robba, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Lakshmi Narayana Reddy, learned standing counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3.

2. With the consent of the parties counsels, the writ petition is being disposed of finally at this stage.

3. Issuance of notice to the unofficial respondent No.4 is dispensed with, as such respondent is considered not necessary to be heard for the decision of the writ petition.

4. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following reliefs :

“…it is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the construction of residential house building in Sy. No. 4/2 admeasuring in a total extent of 157.5 Sq yds which is situated at Resapuvanipalem Village Visakhapatnam District and also trying to evict the petitioner from the above mentioned property as illegal arbitrary high handed ultra vires contrary to the procedure established by law and against to the principles of natural justice apart from being violative o