JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri V.V.Ravi Prasad, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners; Sri T.V.P.Sai Vihari, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 and Sri B.V.Krishna Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent No.3.

2. With the consent of the parties counsels, the writ petition is being disposed of finally at this stage.

3. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for the following relief:-

“Therefore, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court in the interests of justice be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particular in the nature of “Writ of Prohibition” against the 2nd Respondent prohibiting the said authority from proceeding to adjudicate the Complaint No.132/2022 under the provisions of Section 31 of Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 r/w Rule 48 of A.P Real Estate Regulation and Development Rules, 2017, which have been set in motion by issuing notice dated 09.09.2022 based on Complaint of the Respondent as the same is without jurisdiction and in violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and pass such other order or orders as this