BANDARU SYAMSUNDER
A. Peda Narasimhulu – Appellant
Versus
P. Krishna Murty – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The plaintiff in O.S.No.123 of 1986 on the file of Munsif Magistrate, Mummidivaram, is the appellant. The respondents 1 and 2 are D2, D3 in the suit.
2. The appellant is the sole plaintiff instituted the suit against respondents 1 and 2 and also against one Mr.P.Tata Rao @ Appalaswamy against whom suit abated before trial Court as per orders dated 16.12.1991. The plaint schedule described land is the house site measuring 0.04 cents bounded by
South: House of Palepu China Venkanna
West: Vacant land
North: Land of plaintiff
The appellant filed suit for declaration of his right and title and also for possession of plaint schedule property and for consequential permanent injunction restraining the respondents or their men from interfering in any way with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of plaint schedule property and for costs. It is averred in the plaint that plaint schedule property is the absolute property of the appellant having purchased the same under registered sale deeds dated 18.06.1963 and 09.03.1978. The appellant also said to be purchased another 0.02 cents of site apart from plaint schedule property under an agreement of sale dat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.