Valeepu Juvvalamma vs Mamidi Manikyam

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(AP) 144

BANDARU SYAMSUNDER
Valeepu Juvvalamma – Appellant
Versus
Mamidi Manikyam – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: K. Subrahmanyam.
For the Respondent: Sylada Kasi Viswanatham.

JUDGMENT :

BANDARU SYAMSUNDER, J.

1. The 2nd defendant in O.S. No. 145 of 1996 on the file of District Munsif, Kothavalasa is the appellant. The respondent is the plaintiff in the suit. Originally, the suit was filed by the respondent against the appellant and her husband (1st defendant) seeking relief of declaration of his title and consequential relief of permanent injunction, in respect of plaint schedule property, which is a vacant site to an extent of 4 yards x 2 yards with specific boundaries.

2. The appellant and the respondent herein after referred to as 2nd defendant and plaintiff as arrayed before the trial Court.

3. The plaintiff instituted the suit against the defendants 1 and 2, seeking relief of declaration and permanent injunction, in respect of plaint schedule vacant site, which is to an extent of 4 yards x 2 yards with specific boundaries. The plaint schedule is extracted here under:

PLAINT SCHEDULE

District : Vizianagaram

Mandal: Kottavalasa

Village: Tummikapalli

Class of Land: Vacant site Back yard of plaintiff’s house.

Extent: 4 yards x 2 yards = 8 sq. yards.

East: House and site of Mamidi Jaggarao.

South: Plaintiff’s house.

West: House and site of Valeepu Appalanaidu.

North: