Back
RAVI NATH TILHARI
R. Subba Rao – Appellant
Versus
Chief Vigilance Officer, The Cotton Corporation of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Sri Adhitya Harsha Vardhan for M/s. Pillix Law Firm representing the petitioner and Ms. K. Durga Lavanya, learned counsel, representing Sri M. Venkata Krishna Rao, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 3.
2. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for the following relief:-
The Tribunal concluded that simultaneous criminal and departmental proceedings can proceed only if they do not prejudice the applicant's defense, deferring the latter pending the conclusion of the fo....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the departmental proceedings and criminal trial can proceed simultaneously, unless there are specific reasons to stay the departmental proceed....
Departmental inquiries and criminal trials can proceed simultaneously unless staying the inquiry is necessary to prevent prejudice in the criminal trial.
Point of Law : Arguments advanced are clearly devoid of substance, as in present case, at no point of time any departmental enquiry has been held in the past, wherein petitioner has been exonerated, ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
