ORDER :

The petitioner is the holder of a passport bearing No.L4514956 which is in continuation of his earlier passport bearing J5078902.

2. A criminal case had been filed against the petitioner under Section 498A of IPC read with sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and the same was registered as crime No.84 of 2019 in the Disha Police Station, Vijayawada. After the registration of the said crime, the 3rd respondent is said to have seized the passport of the petitioner and forwarded the same to the 2nd respondent for impounding the same on account of the pending criminal case against the petitioner.

3. The petitioner being aggrieved by the said action has approached this Court by way of the present Writ Petition.

4. Sri N. Ravi Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the said action of impounding the passport is not in accordance with the Passport Act. He would point to the section 10 of the Passport Act to contend that none of the conditions set out in section 10 are applicable to the case of the petitioner and as such the passport of the petitioner cannot be impounded. He specifically point to Section 10 (3) (e) which stipulates that the passport of the petitioner can be impounded if he is an accused in a case pending before a court. He would further submit that in view of the various Judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, The Hon’ble High Court of Madras and this Court, it is now settled law that the petitioner would be treated as a person who is facing a criminal case in a Court only when the said Court takes cognizance of the case. He submits that no such cognizance has been taken and as such the provisions of Section 10 (3) (e) would not be applicable.

5. The learned Government Pleader for Home has placed written instructions obtained from the 3rd respondent dated 12.09.2022 in these written instructions, the 3rd respondent specifically states that a charge sheet has been filed before the 2nd Additional Metropolitan Magistrate Vijayawada on 25.02.2022 and cognizance of the case has not yet been taken by the Learned Magistrate.

6. The issue and renewal of passports is regulated by the Passport Act, 1967. Section 10(3) (e), extracted below, is relevant for this purpose.

(3) The passport authority may impound or cause to be impounded or revoke a passport or travel document,—

(a) if the passport authority is satisfied that the holder of the passport or travel document is in wrongful possession thereof;

(b) If the passport or travel document was obtained by the suppression of material information or on the basis of wrong information provided by the holder of the passport or travel document or any other person on his behalf: 5 [Provided that if the holder of such passport obtains another passport, the passport authority shall also impound or cause to be impounded or revoke such other passport.] 1[Provided that if the holder of such passport obtains another passport, the passport authority shall also impound or cause to be impounded or revoke such other passport.

(c) if the passport authority deems it necessary so to do in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of India, friendly relations of India with any foreign country, or in the interests of the general public;

(d) if the holder of the passport or travel document has, at any time after the issue of the passport or travel document, been convicted by a court in India for any offence involving moral turpitude and sentenced in respect thereof to imprisonment for not less than two years;

(e) if proceedings in respect of an offence alleged to have been committed by the holder of the passport or travel document are pending before a criminal court in India;

(f) if any of the conditions of the passport or travel document has been contravened;

(g) if the holder of the passport or travel document has failed to comply with a notice under sub-section (1) requiring him to deliver up the same;

(h) if it is brought to the notice of the passp