Back
BANDARU SYAMSUNDER
Atluri Venkateswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
Atluri Bulli Koteswara Rao – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner/plaintiff under Article 227 of Constitution of India against the orders passed by the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Gannavaram, in I.A. No. 370 of 2016 in O.S. No. 10 of 2015 dated 20.02.2017, wherein and whereby the learned trial Judge dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner/plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 CPC seeking amendment of plaint said to be subsequent events occurred in the suit.
2. The case of the petitioner before the trial Court in brief is that he filed suit for injunction simplicitor against the respondent/defendant wherein he also sought for ad-interim injunction not to interfere boundary line wherein the respondent said to be received notice in injunction petition and also filed counter and written statement and he filed his chief examination affidavit and in the meanwhile the respondent with the help of his servants highhandedly laid pillars and iron fencing by encroaching plaint schedule property in the boundary lane towards north and western side. He submits that to substantiate his contention, he also filed photographs and Campac Disk to prove highhanded act of the respondent. He pr
Amendments to pleadings under Order VI Rule 17 of C.P.C. can be allowed at any stage of proceedings to determine the real controversy.
Amendments to pleadings are permissible when necessary to resolve the real dispute between parties, particularly when issues have not been framed, to avoid multiplicity of litigation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
