SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 2178

P. VADAMALAI
Lalitha Paul Ponnaiah – Appellant
Versus
Philip Navarathinam – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:S. Poornachandran, Advocate. For the Respondent:P. Jessi Jeeva Priya, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer :Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to strike off the plaint in O.S.No.255 of 2017 as well as all proceedings in the said suit on the file of the District Munsif Court, Madurai Town.)

1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed to strike off the plaint in O.S.No.255 of 2017 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Madurai Town.

2. The brief facts of the case: The revision petitioners are the defendants in O.S.No.255 of 2017 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Madurai Town. The respondent/plaintiff has filed the main suit in O.S.No.255 of 2017 for injunction restraining the petitioners/defendants from preventing the construction of compound wall by the respondent/plaintiff on the western side of the suit ''''B'''' schedule property. On service of suit notice along with the copy of plaint, the revision petitioners have filed this present Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to strike off the plaint in O.S.No.255 of 2017 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Madurai Town.

3. Heard both sides and perused the records in this Civil Revision Petition.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top