V. R. K. KRUPA SAGAR
Balli Pothu Raju – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. , rep by PP. – Respondent
ORDER:
1. Questioning the correctness of his conviction, the sole accused preferred this criminal revision case under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. seeking to set aside the judgments of the Courts below. The sole respondent herein is the State.
2. The revision petitioner was prosecuted on the report filed by the police for a charge under Section 324 I.P.C. on the allegation that using an iron rod he inflicted injuries on the body of his wife/PW.2 and his brother-in-law/PW.1. The said case was tried as C.C.No.361 of 2006 by the learned VI Additional Munsif Magistrate, Guntur and the accused was found guilty for the offence under Section 324 I.P.C. and by a judgment dated 09.09.2008 he was convicted and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year on two counts for inflicting injuries on two individuals. Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.
3. Aggrieved by it, the accused preferred Criminal Appeal No.300 of 2008. Learned Special Sessions Judge-cum-IV Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur duly heard the appeal and by a judgment dated 27.04.2009 it agreed with the finding of guilt recorded by the trial Court but on facts it reduced the sentence from one
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.