V. R. K. KRUPA SAGAR
D. Venkataratnam – Appellant
Versus
Sate of A. P. – Respondent
ORDER :
These two criminal revision cases filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. are from the same individual and as against the same individual and both pertain to the same case and therefore, they are considered together and are to be disposed of together.
2. Crime No.33 of 2010 of R.A.Valasa Police Station was investigated into by the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Palakonda and after completion of the investigation, the police report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. was filed before learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Rajam. The police report discloses 37 individuals as A.1 to A.37 committed the offences alleged. It enlisted 55 witnesses. The investigative outcome is that Kagitapalli Village is in Parampeta Panchayat. A.2 is Sarpanch of the village. A.1 is her husband and he was the former Sarpanch. In this village there were groups among some political parties and there were disputes among them. There were also disputes between one political party as against the other political party. There were cases and counter cases in the earlier periods. Since certain allegations came up as against Sarpanch and others about misuse of funds, once again the controversies between groups erup
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.