Ram Pratap Singh VS State Of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

VIKAS BUDHWAR
Ram Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Revisionist : Man Bahadur Singh

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Man Bahadur Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Munne Lal, learned AGA for the State.

2. This is a revision under Section 397/401 of the Cr.P.C. instituted by the revisionist herein challenging the order dated 13.4.2022 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Azamgarh passed in Criminal Case No.99 of 2022 (Ram Pratap Singh Vs. Rakesh Singh and others) rejecting the application so preferred Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., Police Station Kotwali (Shahar), District Azamgarh.

3. Learned counsel for the revisionist has argued that he is the member of one of the committee of the Ruling party and so far as the opposite party nos. 2 to 4 are concerned they are also having some political connections. According to learned counsel for the revisionist on 4.2.2022 the revisionist received a phone call from the opposite party no.2 requiring him to present in the house and the revisionist thereafter proceeded to his house on 11.35 wherein the opposite party nos. 2 to 4 were already present and they hurled abuses in Hindi vernacular and thereafter administered beating and robbed the revisionist of an amount of Rs.8500/-. He has further argued that he had taken