IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI
A.V. RAVINDRA BABU, J.
Eepu Lovathalli @ Lovaraju, S/o Rajulu – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.177 of 2009
Decided on : 08-09-2023
JUDGMENT :
The judgment, dated 09.02.2009 in Sessions Case No.304 of 2007, on the file of III Additional Sessions Judge, Kakinada (“Additional Sessions Judge” for short), is under challenge in the present Criminal Appeal filed by the appellant Nos.1 and 2, who were the Accused Nos.1 and 2, in the above said Sessions Case.
2) The parties to this Criminal Appeal will hereinafter be referred to as described before the trial Court for the sake of convenience.
3) The Sessions Case No.304 of 2007, on the file of III Additional Sessions Judge, Kakinada, arose out of a committal order in P.R.C.No.3 of 2007, on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Turni, relating to Crime No.5 of 2007 of Tuni Rural Police Station.
4) The case of the prosecution, in brief, according to the contents of the charge sheet as above, is as follows:
(i) A.1, A.2 and A.4 are residents of Seethayyapeta, h/o Velama Kothuru Village of Tuni Mandal. They are own brothers. A.3 is resident of Mukundarajupeta Village of Nakkapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. He is a cousin to A.1, A.2 and A.3. One Gorla Veerraju S/o Satyanarayana (hereinafter will be referred to as “deceased”), was resident of Seethayyapeta, h/o Velama Kothuru Village of Tuni Mandal. The defacto-complainant-Gorla Babji (L.W.1) and another injured Gorla Nageswara Rao (L.W.2) are own brothers. They are the sons of deceased. The deceased was having two wives viz., Satyavathi and Gorla Appalakonda- L.W.3. He got two sons and one daughter to his first wife- Satyavathi. Five years ago, Satyavathi passed away. Later, the marriage of her daughter and elder son Gorla Srinu (L.W.9) was performed by the deceased. Marriage L.W.9 was performed with L.W.10-Gorla Arjamma, who is no other than the own sister’s daughter of the deceased. Arjamma is own sister of A.1, A.2 and A.4.
(ii) On the eve of Pongal festival, L.W.9-Gorla Srinu, the son of the first wife of deceased, went to his in-laws house along with his wife Arjamma. On 16.01.2007 afternoon, he had a quarrel with his wife, during which he beat his mother-in-law with a stick when she intervened in the middle. Then A.1, A.2 and A.4 being the brother-in-laws of L.W.9 assaulted him. Then L.W.9 threatened them that he would take care of them by bringing his father and brothers and left the house of his in-laws and went to the house of the deceased. He raised a dispute with the deceased on the ground that the deceased and the sons of his second wife are not supporting him, due to which he became lenient among his brothers-in-law. During the said conversation, the deceased beat L.W.9.
(iii) A.1, A.2 and A.4 with A.3 were waiting at the end of the street expecting that the deceased and his sons would support the cause of L.W.9. So, they raided the house of the deceased at 3-00 p.m., armed with sticks and picked up quarrel with the deceased for sending his son L.W.9 to draw Swords against them. Then a verbal altercation took place between A.1 to A.4 on one side and the deceased on the other side. In that quarrel, A.1 and A.2 indiscriminately beat the deceased with sticks on his head. When on seeing this, L.W.2 intervened to rescue the deceased, A.3 dealt two hefty blows on his head and right hand elbow. Then L.W.1 intervened and then A.4 beat him with a stick on his head and left side of the neck. They caused bleeding injuries to him. During that struggle A.1 and A.2 also received injuries in the hands of their adversaries. On seeing the incident and when the neighbours gathered, A.1 to A.4 fled away from the spot with their sticks. The deceased, L.W.1 and L.W.2 were referred to Government Area Hospital, Tuni by their family members on the same day. On 16.01.2007 at 5-35 p.m., the deceased died while undergoing treatment in Government Hospital, Tuni.
(iv) On the basis of the hospital intimation and the statement of L.W.1, L.W.19-Sub-Inspector of Police, Tuni Rural Police Station, registered a case in Crime No.5 of 2007 under Sections 302 , 324 r/w 34 of I.P.C. L.W.2
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for reliability and consistency in witness testimonies and evidence presented by the prosecution to establish guilt beyond reasonable doub....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the careful consideration of evidence and the application of the benefit of doubt in determining the guilt of the accused.
The court ruled that the prosecution's failure to explain the injuries on the accused and reliance on interested witnesses without independent corroboration rendered the conviction unsafe.
Prosecution must substantiate charges with reliable evidence; significant discrepancies in witness statements and medical evidence warrant acquittal.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between culpable homicide and murder, based on the absence of premeditation, undue advantage, or cruel behavior by the accused.
Unexplained injuries on accused in same incident doubt prosecution genesis; benefit of doubt mandates acquittal despite eyewitness testimony.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.