IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J.
Jamshedpur Utilities Services Company Limited – Petitioner
Versus
The Commissioner of Labour, Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Writ Petition No.29689 of 2011
Decided On : 01-02-2023
Constitution of India,1950 - Article 226 - Companies Act, 1956 - Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996 - Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996 - Contract agreement - Bidder - Petitioner was carved out of Tata Steel from its Town Services Division - Mandate for petitioner was to convert an obligatory service into a customer focused sustainable corporate entity. Petitioner is India's only comprehensive urban infrastructure service provider - Group purpose is reflected in the petitioner's mission of providing 'Quality Services for Life'. Petitioner provides comprehensive services in supply of water to both industrial and domestic customers - Ranges of services cover operations and maintenance of the entire water cycle from intake to treatment, conveyance and distribution - Petitioner integrates his service with capabilities such as asset management activities, GIS, billing, collection and Non Revenue Water reduction programmes - Whether contract entered into by petitioner with 3rd respondent on 04.08.2008 would attract provisions of Acts 27 and 28 of 1996 and Rules made thereunder? - Held, in view of expressions above referred to supra, contention of the learned senior counsel that though word civil work is included in the contract infact, petitioner did not execute any civil work falls to ground - If information required by 2nd respondent is made available, 2nd respondent will take a decision - Court doesn't find any irregularity in issuing notice to petitioner to submit information in Form-I of the Building and other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Rules 1996 - There are no merits in the writ petition - In view of the interim order, petitioner shall submit the relevant record as required to competent authority within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of order- If any information, as required, is furnished, it is needless to observe competent authority shall dispose of same strictly in accordance with law and communicate same to the petitioner - Writ petition is dismissed.
ORDER :
1. The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-
“to issue a Writ, more particularly, one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction-
a) Declaring that the Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996, the Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996 and the Central and State Rules framed thereunder are not applicable to the work being carried out by the petitioner herein under the Agreements dated 04.08.2008 between the Respondent No.3 viz., the General Manager (TS), Uranium Corporation of India, Ltd., Thummalapalli Project (Post), Vemula (M), YSR District and the petitioner; and consequently.
b) declaring that the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein viz., The Commissioner of Labour & the Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Kadapa have no jurisdiction whatsoever and that no amount is payable to them towards cess under the Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996 and the Central and State Rules framed thereunder, while also declaring that the Notice No.UCIL/TMPL/Accts/77/Cess/2011, dated 20.08.2011 issued by Respondent No.3 viz., the General Manager (TS) Uranium Corporation of India Ltd., Thummalapalli Project (Post), Vemula (M) YSR District as being void, non-est, invalid, enforceable and inoperative in law; and consequently.
c) restrain the Respondents, their Officers and Staff, from enforcing the Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Services) Act, 1996, the Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996 and the Central and State Rules framed thereunder against the activities carried on by the Petitioner pertaining to erection and commissioning of Uranium Ore Mining Processing Project of the Respondent No.3 as awarded under the contract dated 04.08.2008; and
And pass such other order or orders ….”.
2. The averments, in brief, in the writ affidavit are:
Petitioner is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at Sakchi Boulevard Road, Northern Town, Bistupur, Jamshedpur – 831 001, Jharkhand with its Water Service Division having its Tummalapalle Project office at door No.4-11-112, Near Sujatha Theatre, Pulivendula, YSR Kadapa District. Petitioner was carved out of Tata Steel from its Town Services Division in 2004. The mandate for the petitioner was to convert an obligatory service into a customer focused sustainable corporate entity. Petitioner is India’s only comprehensive urban infrastructure service provider. The group purpose is reflected in the petitioner’s mission of providing ‘Quality Services for Life’. Petitioner provides comprehensive services in the supply of water to both industrial and domestic customers. The ranges of services cover operations and maintenance of the entire water cycle from intake to treatment, conveyance and distribution. The petitioner integrates his service with capabilities such as asset management activities, GIS, billing, collection and Non Revenue Water reduction programmes.
Respondent No.3 herein is a Government of India undertaking established for carrying on mining uranium ore in the country. Respondent No.3 invited sealed tender vide tender No.UCTL-3, dated 26.07.2007 for design, engineering, planning, procurement, supply, manufacture/ fabrication, painting, erection, testing and inspection, commissioning and performance testing, complete in all aspects, on EPC/Turnkey basis, of all mechanical, electrical, civil, structural, architectural, air conditioning and ventilation, environmental, control and instrumentation with all equipment and accessories for the intake pump and intake well & pump house, pipeline laying from intake to hill top reservoir and pipeline laying from hilltop reservoir to intermediate reservoir including pump house and subsequently to plant. Underground res
SupremeToday
(1) Cess could only be recovered in the manner stipulated in Cess Act and Rules framed thereunder.(2) A contractor who enters into a pure Supply Contract is statutorily exempted from levy under BOCW ....
The imposition of 1% cess under the Building and Other Construction Workers Act is a statutory obligation aimed at benefiting workers, and is applicable despite claims regarding the Factories Act exe....
The court established that construction works like blast furnaces fall under 'building or other construction work' as defined in labor laws, ensuring their obligations for labor welfare remain intact....
Cess under the Cess Act read with BOCW Act is leviable in respect of building and other construction works.
The court held that deductions for the cess on construction payments are valid under the relevant welfare legislation, affirming that activities like laying pipelines constitute construction work.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the labour cess is not leviable on the supply of materials and consultancy charges under the Building and Other Construction Workers' Welfare ....
Statutory liability to pay welfare cess under labor legislation falls upon the contractor as the employer. Such liability is inherent to the statute, cannot be reallocated via contract clauses based ....
The interpretation of the Building and Other Construction Workers Act and the Cess Act requires the establishment of welfare boards for the effective levy and collection of cess; until then, contract....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.