VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
Kolli Srinivasa Rao – Appellant
Versus
Superintendent of Police – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following reliefs:
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for the Respondents.
3. The brief facts of the case are that while the petitioner was working as Police Constable in Nallapadu, Guntur District, it appeared in the press news publishe
Naryan Dattatraya Ramteerathakhar v. State of Maharashtra &Ors.
Union of India (Uoi) and others Vs. Mohd. Ibrahim, (2001) ILLJ 1642 SC
Union of India v. Mohan Lal Kapoor
The judgment emphasizes the importance of specific and proven charges, adherence to procedural rules, and consideration of the petitioner's explanation in disciplinary proceedings.
Point of law: Whenever an inquiring authority is to be appointed for conducting enquiry under the said rules, they are also requested to bring these instructions to the notice of their subordinates f....
Disciplinary proceedings must adhere to principles of natural justice, including the right to cross-examine witnesses; failure to do so invalidates penalties imposed.
The principles of natural justice require that a delinquent employee be given a copy of the preliminary enquiry report before the disciplinary authority arrives at its conclusions with regard to the ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.