IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J.
T.H.J. Raju – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 331 of 2019
Decided On : 19-01-2023
Constitution of India,1950 - "Konda Kapu" community, which comes under Schedule Tribe category - Seeking to declare belonging to category - Community Certificates -Voters List - Proof - Held, impugned notice does not show purpose and which the notice has been issued - On other hand in counter it is stated that a complaint has been received from with regard to issuance of bogus Caste Certificates by then Tahsildar from onwards - No doubt Caste Certificate produced by petitioner is of year 2008 - This Court cannot decide genuineness or otherwise of said certificate Writ jurisdiction - As rightly contended by counsel for petitioners if in the impugned notice particulars of reports given by Tahsildars and Project Officer ITDA are clearly mentioned in counter petitioners would have submitted proper explanation - He also rightly contended that in absence of those particulars giving explanation is not possible - Writ Petition is Allowed.
ORDER :
1. The present Writ Petition is filed by the petitioners seeking to declare the notice issued by the 3rd respondent-Chairman and Joint Collector, District Level Scrutiny Committee, under From No. VI in Ref. C5/M/104/2018, dated 07.01.2019, calling upon the petitioners herein to appear before the Scrutiny Committee for caste enquiry, along with proofs, on 25.01.2019, as illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same.
2. The case of the petitioners herein is that they belong to “Konda Kapu” community, which comes under Schedule Tribe category and all the petitioners are blood relations.
It is stated that paternal grandfather of the 2nd petitioner’s father is Thumu Pamulayya, who was resident of Dusarapamu Village of Rajavommangi Mandal in East Godavari District, which is an agency area and his wife Sanyasamma, belongs to Okurthi Village, which is also agency area and they had a son by name Thumu Suranna. The said Thumu Suranna and his wife Atchiyamma had two sons, namely, Pothuraju @ Rajulu, father of the 2nd petitioner and another son is by name, Kalyanam. Father of the petitioner had four sons and two daughters and 1st petitioner is 3rd son and the 2nd petitioner is the 4th son of the said Pothuraju. The 3rd petitioner is the grandson of Pothuraju @ Rajulu and petitioners 4 and 5 are minor children of the 3rd petitioner. The said Kalyanam had only two sons and petitioners 6 and 7 are the grand children of Kalyanam.
It is the further case of the petitioners that, their ancestors are permanent residents of Dusarapamu Village of agency area in East Godavari District and the petitioners born in the said village and studied there and they married the persons belonging to Dusarapamu, Gontivanipalem and Vendurthi, which are also agency villages in East Godavari District. It is also stated that they are exercising right of vote in agency area and they were also several times given Community Certificates by the Revenue Authorities. Further, it is stated that prior to independence, their ancestors were granted rough pattas by the British people and the LTRP Cases filed against the petitioners were dismissed as they belong to ST community.
It is the further case of the petitioners that, during the caste verification of petitioner’s brother, Thumu Veerabhadreswara Rao, the Revenue Authorities made discrete enquiries and basing on the documents, mediator’s report, Community Certificates, Voters List, etc. the 5th respondent-Tahsildar and the 4th respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer recommended to the 2nd respondent-District Collector to declare him as “Konda Kapu” Community and finally, the 5th respondent vide Ref. No. C/816/2008, dated 10.07.2008 issued a Community Certificate to the son of the 2nd petitioner’s brother as “Konda Kapu.” As such, petitioners” community remained as “Konda Kapu.”
It is the further case of the petitioners that, a notice under Form VI, dated 07.01.2019 was issued by the 3rd respondent-Chairman and Joint Collector, District Level Scrutiny Committee, for the purpose of community verification with regard to the Caste Certificates issued to family members of the petitioners, without verifying the earlier record and without disclosing the details of the persons who filed petitions before the 4th respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer. Questioning the said notice, the present Writ Petition has been filed.
3. To the said Writ Petition, the 2nd respondent-District Collector filed his counter denying the allegations, inter-alia, contending that State General Secretary of “Adivasi Samkshema Parishad” has made a complaint before the 2nd respondent, stating that the Revenue Authorities are issuing several bogus Schedule Tribe Community Certificates in all seven Mandals of Rampachodavaram, ITDA area to the persons belonging to Scheduled Castes, Backward Classes, etc. on their migration to scheduled areas, due to which much injustice is being caused to original tribal people and the fake Schedule Tribe Certificate holders
Point of law : As seen from sub-rule (10) of Rule 9, the Commissioner of Tribal Welfare/Director of Tribal Welfare, either suo motu or on a written complaint by any person made by an employer/educati....
Court directs lawful inquiry into community certificate despite prior validations, disposing writ petition.
Undue cancellation of caste certificate requires adherence to procedural fairness; the burden of proof lies with authorities disputing caste claims.
The court emphasized the importance of scrutinizing caste certificates with utmost expedition and promptitude, and highlighted that re-opening cases without sufficient reason would be detrimental to ....
The court emphasized the necessity for fair inquiry processes and the principle of inherited social status in inter-caste marriages, ruling that the petitioner was wrongly denied Scheduled Tribe stat....
Only the Caste Scrutiny Committee has jurisdiction to verify caste certificates, rendering unauthorized inquiries invalid under the Odisha Act, 2011.
A person who is not aggrieved by an order issued under the Andhra Pradesh (Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes) Regulation of Issue of Community certificates Act, 1993, does not h....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.