VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
D. Ankineedu – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Director (V. & S. ) – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This writ petition is filed to declare the action of the respondents in not counting the past service of the petitioner for calculating the seniority, pensionary benefits, etc. As per the proceedings of the 3rd respondent dated 26.03.2018, as illegal and arbitrary and contrary to A.P.S.R.T.C. Employees (Classification, Control and Appeal) Regulations, 1967 (for short “the Regulations, 1967”).
2. Heard Sri M. Lakshminarayana, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri P. Durga Prasad, learned standing counsel for APSRTC appearing for the respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was initially appointed as Security Constable in the respondent-corporation on 05.02.1999 and later, his services were regularised. While so, the 1st respondent issued a charge memo to the petitioner on 24.11.2016 based on a preliminary enquiry behind the back of the petitioner alleging that the petitioner is carrying out outsourcing contract works in benami names in APSRTC depots and withdrawing the salary amounts from the bank accounts of outsourcing workers duly keeping their ATM cards and passbooks with him. On receipt of the charge memo, the petitione
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.