C. PRAVEEN KUMAR, B. V. L. N. CHAKRAVARTHI
Kuruva Sreenivasulu, Kurnool Dist. – Appellant
Versus
SHO, Ullindakonda P. S. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
C. Praveen Kumar, J.
1. Heard Sri. G. Vijaya Saradhi, learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant No.1 in Criminal Appeal No. 1101 of 2015; Sri. Shaik Meeravali, learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant No.2 in Criminal Appeal No. 621 of 2015 and Sri. S. Dushyanth Reddy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing for the State.
2. Criminal Appeal No. 621 of 2015 is filed by Accused No.2, while Criminal Appeal No. 1101 of 2015 is filed by Accused No.1. Both these Appeals were filed against the Judgment, dated 01.04.2015, passed in SC/ST Sessions Case No. 6 of 2015 on the file of the Special Judge for Trial of Cases under SCs and STs (POA) Act-cum-VI Additional Sessions Judge, Kurnool.
3. Originally, Accused Nos. 1 and 2 were tried for the offences punishable under Sections 366, 376(2)(m) and 376(d) I.P.C. Accused No. 1 alone was tried for the offence punishable under Section 394 I.P.C., while Accused No.2 was tried for the offences punishable under Section 394 r/w. 34 I.P.C. and Section 3(2)(V) of SC and ST (POA) Act. By its judgment, dated 01.04.2015, the learned Sessions Judge convicted both the Accused and sentenced them to (i) suffer rigorous imprisonment for a pe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.