SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Bom) 1649

SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI
Kisan, S/o. Damaji Naik – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr Chaitanya C. Deshpande.
For the Respondents: Mr S.P. Deshmukh, Ms. Shital E. Waghmare.

Table of Content
1. summary of incident leading to charges. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
2. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 16 , 20)
3. evaluation of evidence presented. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 27 , 31 , 32 , 40 , 41 , 42)
4. legal conclusions regarding evidence. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 55 , 57)
5. final judgment and order. (Para 60 , 62)

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard finally with consent of both the sides at admission stage.

2. Feeling aggrieved by the impugned Judgment and order of conviction rendered by the learned Sessions Judge, Nandurbar in Sessions Case No.01/2018, thereby convicting the appellants/original accused Nos. 1 and 2 for the offences punishable under sections 376(1), 341, 506 and 109 of IPC and under sections 4, 12 and 17 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as 'the POCSO Act' for the sake of convenience), original accused Nos. 1 and 2/appellant Nos. 1 and 2 have preferred this appeal by taking aid of s

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top