SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 451

RAVI NATH TILHARI
Meena Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. Heard Sri V.R. Reddy Kovvuri, learned counsel for the writ petitioners in the writ petition No.17520 of 2020. Sri V.R. Reddy Kovvuri had submitted that he had instructions from the petitioners to appear and argue on their behalf and that he shall file Vakalat within two days. He was permitted to argue on the said representation.

2. Sri Abhay Siddnath Mootha, learned counsel on record for the petitioners was also heard who had adopted the arguments of Sri V.R. Reddy Kovvuri.

3. Also heard Sri C. Suman, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 and Sri V. Sai Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.4.

4. Perused the material on record.

5. By means of the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have questioned the Notice/proceedings in R.C.U.C.No.2/2020/WPRS/188, dated /08/2020 issued by the Vijayawada Municipal Corporation, Vijayawada, Krishna District (in short, V.M.C) directing the petitioners to remove the deviations in construction of the building as indicated in the notice/proceedings within the specified time, failing which it was provided that those deviations shall be removed/pulled down by the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top