JUDGMENT

RAVI NATH TILHARI, J. - Heard Sri K. Raja Shekar, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Corporation for respondent No.1, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent No.2 and Sri M. Manohar Reddy, learned standing counsel for 3rd respondent.

2. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for the following relief:-

"....to issue an appropriate writ or any other order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing the order in Roc.No.1105/2022/G1, dtd. 8/9/2022 in so far as directing the petitioners to vacate from their respective houses is concerned, is illegal, contrary to the provisions of the A.P. Municipalities Act and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent Nos.2 and 3 not to dispossess the petitioner's from their houses bearing Door Nos.17/3/165/3, 17/3/165/2, 16/8/25, 17/3/165/36, 17/3/165/35, 17/3/165/34, 17-3-8/3 and 17/3/165/2 respectively, situated in Ward No.4 in T.S.No.1628 of Narasaraopet Town, Palnadu District till final