SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 1114

NINALA JAYASURYA
Panangipalli Venkata Chalapathi Rao – Appellant
Versus
Bandaru Atchuta Swetha – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
A.K.Kishore Reddy, Advocate, Sasanka Bhuvanagiri, Advocate

JUDGMENT

NAINALA JAYASURYA, J. - Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard learned counsel for the 1st respondent/complainant and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the 2nd respondent-State.

2. The present Criminal Petition is filed seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/5th respondent in D.V.C.No.1 of 2021 on the file of the Court of Learned Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Peddapuram, East Godavari District, on the premise that there is no domestic relationship between the petitioner and the 1st respondent herein.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, submits that the petitioner, who is arrayed as the 5th respondent in the said D.V.C, is a "friend" of the husband of the 1st respondent. While drawing the attention of this Court to the application filed in D.V.C, the learned counsel submits that the petitioner is falsely implicated in the D.V.C and further that as there is no relationship between the petitioner and husband and in-laws of the 1st respondent, the provisions of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for short "D.V. Act") are not attracted. In the said c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top