ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATI
Cheekati Manavendranath Roy, J.
Veluganti Venkatesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 1477 of 2022
Decided On : 11-03-2022
Identification - Prima Facie Case - Pre-arrest Bail
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner is the sole accused in a case under Section 7(B) r/w 8(a) of the A.P. Prohibition Act. The police found a person stirring a plastic drum with a stick at the scene of the offence, who ran away upon seeing the police. The police found 600 liters of F.J Wash at the scene and identified the person who ran away as the petitioner.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that there was no valid basis for the identification of the petitioner as the person who ran away from the scene of the offence. The accusation made against the petitioner was prima facie not well founded, and therefore, the petitioner was entitled to pre-arrest bail on certain conditions.
Issues: The issues revolved around the validity of the identification of the petitioner as the person who fled the scene of the offence and the prima facie basis of the accusation against the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the lack of a valid basis for the identification of the petitioner and the prima facie unfounded nature of the accusation against the petitioner.
Final Decision: The Criminal Petition was allowed, and in the event of the petitioner's arrest, he was to be released on bail upon execution of a self bond for Rs.50,000 with two sureties for a like sum each, with the condition to report before the Station House Officer once a week until the charge sheet is filed.
JUDGMENT
Cheekati Manavendranath Roy, J. - This Criminal Petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is filed to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest.
2. The petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.159 of 2022 of Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Rajamahendravaram South.
3. a case under Section 7(B) r/w 8(a) of the a.P. Prohibition act was registered against him.
4. It is the case of the prosecution that when the police were conducting raids to detect prohibition offences that they found one person at the scene of offence stirring with stick in a plastic drum and after seeing the police that the said person ran away from the scene of offence. Police found 600 liters of F.J Wash at the scene of offence. It is stated that the police have identified the said person who ran away as the petitioner herein. Therefore, the petitioner is shown as accused in the above crime.
5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
6. admittedly, the petitioner was not apprehended at the scene of offence while he was in possession of any such contraband. The person, who was found at the scene of offence, ran away. although it is stated that the police have identified the said person as the petitioner herein, there is no valid basis for the said identification. Therefore, the very identity of the person, who ran away from the scene of offence, is in serious dispute. So, in the said facts and circumstances of the case, the accusation made against the petitioner is prima facie not well founded. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled for pre-arrest bail on certain conditions.
7. Resultantly, this Criminal Petition is allowed. In the event of arrest of the petitioner in the above crime, he shall be forthwith released on bail on execution of self bond for Rs.50,000/-(Rupees fifty thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Rajamahendravaram South. On his release, the petitioner shall report before the Station House Officer of Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Rajamahendravaram South, once in a week on every Monday between 10-00 a.M. to 5-00 P.M. till the charge sheet is filed in this case.
The validity of identification and the entitlement to pre-arrest bail based on the lack of valid basis for identification and serious dispute over the person's identity.
Lack of valid identification and dispute over the identity of the accused at the scene of the offence can entitle the accused to pre-arrest bail.
The validity of identification and the disputed identity of the accused influenced the decision to grant pre-arrest bail.
The validity of identification and the prima facie well-founded nature of the accusation are crucial in determining the grant of pre-arrest bail.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the validity of identification and the existence of a serious dispute regarding the identity of the accused can entitle the accused to pre-arr....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.