SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 583

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Avanigadda Venkayamma, Krishna Dist – Appellant
Versus
Munnangi Raghavulu, Krishna Dist – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Yallabandi Ramatirtha, Advocate, V.S.R.Anjaneyalu, Advocate

JUDGMENT

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J. - This is a defendant's second appeal under Sec. 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree dtd. 17/1/2000 passed in A.S.No.3 of 1998 by the Senior Civil Judge, Avanigadda, reversing the judgment and decree dtd. 11/8/1997 passed in O.S.No.166 of 1991 by the District Munsif, Avanigadda.

2. This appeal has been admitted treating grounds (a), (b), (c) and (f) in the memorandum of appeal as substantial questions of law. The said grounds/substantial questions of law are as follows:

    '(a) Whether it is permissible to parties to adduce oral evidence in proof of title alleged to have been acquired under a will deed and gift deed without either examining a single witness or even producing the documents.

    (b) Whether it is permissible for the parties to claim title under a gift deed which is not registered.

    (c) Whether it is permissible to parties to bequeath a certain share prior to partition of joint properties.

    (f) Whether the appellate court has not erred in concluding that defendant did not succeed in establishing his claim over the property when it is settled law that plaintiff must succeed on his own strength and not on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top