SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 602

B. V. L. N. CHAKRAVARTHI
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company – Appellant
Versus
Miryala Venkata Subbamma – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Gudi Srinivasu, Advocate

JUDGMENT

B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI, J. - Heard Sri Gudi Srinivasu, learned counsel for the revisionpetitioner.

2. None appeared for the respondents. Admit the revision.

3. This revision-petition is directed against the Order, dtd. 27/3/2015 in I.A.No.551 of 2015 in M.V.O.P.No.245 of 2011 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge, Ongole, whereunder the Trial Court Dismissed" the application filed by the revision-petitioner under Order XVI Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity CPC").

4. Learned counsel for the revision-petitioner Sri Gudi Srinivasu would submit that the Tribunal failed to appreciate the facts and the circumstances of the cases on hand and the Judgments in Loyola Public School Society, Secunderabad vs. P.Anil Kumar and others,2008 (1) ALD 8. and B.Venkat Ram Reddy vs. K.Srinivas and others,2005 (2) ALD 735.. in a proper perspective and thereby came to a wrong conclusion, Dismissed" the application filed by the revision-petitioner under Order XVI Rule 1 and 2 of CPC for summoning the respondent No.4/owner-cum-driver of the crime vehicle involved in the accident, to produce the Original Policy" along with payment deta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top