Back
B. V. L. N. CHAKRAVARTHI
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company – Appellant
Versus
Miryala Venkata Subbamma – Respondent
JUDGMENT
B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI, J. - Heard Sri Gudi Srinivasu, learned counsel for the revisionpetitioner.
2. None appeared for the respondents. Admit the revision.
3. This revision-petition is directed against the Order, dtd. 27/3/2015 in I.A.No.551 of 2015 in M.V.O.P.No.245 of 2011 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge, Ongole, whereunder the Trial Court Dismissed" the application filed by the revision-petitioner under Order XVI Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity CPC").
4. Learned counsel for the revision-petitioner Sri Gudi Srinivasu would submit that the Tribunal failed to appreciate the facts and the circumstances of the cases on hand and the Judgments in Loyola Public School Society, Secunderabad vs. P.Anil Kumar and others,2008 (1) ALD 8. and B.Venkat Ram Reddy vs. K.Srinivas and others,2005 (2) ALD 735.. in a proper perspective and thereby came to a wrong conclusion, Dismissed" the application filed by the revision-petitioner under Order XVI Rule 1 and 2 of CPC for summoning the respondent No.4/owner-cum-driver of the crime vehicle involved in the accident, to produce the Original Policy" along with payment deta
The main legal point established is that a court should not dismiss an application without considering the specific reasons provided by the petitioner and should not rely solely on headnotes of previ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the obligation of the owner and driver to produce a valid and effective driving license, the authority of the Tribunal to entertain review applicat....
Amendment under Order VI Rule 17 refused when it changes claim's fundamental character from passengers in goods vehicle to workers crushed below road, withdraws admissions, lacks due diligence, and a....
Amendment under Order VI Rule 17 rejected as it introduced new inconsistent facts changing accident from passengers injured in rollover to workers crushed by rolling vehicle, altering cause of action....
Amendment under Order VI Rule 17 rejected in claim petition as it altered fundamental nature from passenger death in goods vehicle to crushing of labourer, lacked due diligence, contradicted FIR, and....
Amendment under Order VI Rule 17 CPC impermissible if changes basic structure of pleadings, withdraws admissions, lacks due diligence, and counters insurer defense post-reply in motor accident claim ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
