J. J. MUNIR
Radhey Shyam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Nagina Devi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. orders of the motor accident claims tribunals (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. hearing focused on maintainability of revisions (Para 4) |
| 3. conflict regarding tribunal status under section 115 cpc (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. affirmation of full bench ruling on tribunal's status (Para 7 , 11 , 13) |
| 5. civil revisions maintained (Para 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT
J.J. Munir, J.
These Civil Revisions arise out of orders passed by the Presiding Officers of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunals at Ballia and Chandauli that are not awards amenable to appeal under section 173 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988. The revisions were not formally connected, but since both involve an identical question about maintainability, the issue is being dealt with by a common order.
2. Civil Revision No. 66 of 2022 preferred under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenges an order passed by the Presiding Officer, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ballia in Misc. Case No. 22 of 2019, refusing to set aside the ex-parte award dated 22.12.2018 passed in Motor Accident Claims Petition No. 44 of 2022.
3. By the order impugned in Civil Revision No. 48 of 2022, the revisionist has invoked this Court's jur
Barkat Singh v. Hans Raj Pandit 1984 SCC Online P&H 632 : AIR 1985 P&H 263
Beeran v. Rajappan 1979 SCC Online Ker 189 : 1980 ACJ 287
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company v. Smt. Ramawati 2017 (9) ADJ 752 (LB)
New India Assurance Company Limited v. Rakesh Kumar 2010 (4) AWC 4153 (LB)
Oriental Insurance Company Limited through Divisional Manager, Meerut v. Smt. Manju
The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal lacks the power to review its orders, and the vehicle involved in the accident was deemed fit under applicable rules.
The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 does not empower the Claims Tribunal to review its own awards, and the powers of a Civil Court conferred on the Tribunal do not extend to reviewing decisions.
The court held that no appeal lies under S.173 of the Motor Vehicles Act when awarded compensation is below Rs. 10,000, reinforcing limits on judicial review of legislative provisions.
(1) Territorial jurisdiction of Court – Lack of territorial jurisdiction by itself is not recognized under it as a reason to make a judgment/decree a nullity – It is quite different and distinct from....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.