Back
V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Vempati Subbaiah – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO, J.
1. The appellant is 3rdrespondent/Insurance company and the respondents are claim petitioner and respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 and 5 in M.V.O.P.No. 781 of 2005 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-Principal District Judge, West Godavari at Eluru. The appellant filed the instant appeal questioning the legal validity of the order of the Tribunal.
2. For the sake of convenience, both the parties in the appeal will be referred to as they are arrayed in the claim petition.
3. The claim petitioner filed the petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 read with Rule 455 of the A.P.M.V. Rules, 1994 claiming compensation of Rs.50,000/- for the injuries sustained by him in a motor vehicle accident that took place on 04.01.2005.
4. The brief averments in the petition filed by the petitioner are as follows:
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of contributory negligence and the liability of insurance companies in motor vehicle accident cases.
Contributory negligence and apportionment of liability between insurers and drivers under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of contributory negligence and the liability of the insurance company under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the liability of the insurance company to pay compensation for accidents involving vehicles insured under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the cal....
Liability of the insurance company to satisfy the award in favor of a third party, even in the case of absence, fake, or invalid license of the driver, and the procedure for the insurance company to ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the liability of insurers in cases of negligent driving and the apportionment of compensation in accordance with the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Liability of Insurance company to pay compensation despite driver's lack of required endorsement on driving license.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which allows for compensation without the need to prove rash and negligent drivin....
The main legal point established is that the driver of the tractor-trailer was held liable for the accident, and the Insurance companies were not liable to pay compensation due to the driver not havi....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
