Back
V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
United India Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Subbarathnamma – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The appellant is 2nd respondent/Insurance company and the respondents are claim petitioners and respondent No.1 in M.V.O.P.No.503 of 2008 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-IV Additional District Judge, Tirupati. The appellant filed the appeal questioning the legal validity of the order of the Tribunal.
2. For the sake of convenience, both the parties in the appeal will be referred to as they are arrayed in the claim petition.
3. The claim petitioners filed the petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 claiming compensation of Rs.7,00,000/- for the death of A.Venkata Narasaiah, who is husband of 1st petitioner and father of petitioner Nos.2 & 3, in a motor vehicle accident that took place on 07.11.2007.
4. The brief averments in the petition filed by the petitioners are as follows:
On 07.11.2007 the deceased was travelling in an auto bearing registration No. AP 03W 7513 from K.V.B.Puram to Srikalahasti and when the auto reached near Sivanadhapuram of Thottambedu Mandal at about 4.00 p.m., a tractor-trailer bearing registration No.AP 03C 7594 & 7595 being driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner with high speed came in
The main legal point established in the judgment is the liability of the insurance company to pay compensation for accidents involving vehicles insured under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the cal....
Liability of the insurance company to pay compensation to the petitioners in the first instance and recover the same from the owner of the offending vehicle.
Contributory negligence and apportionment of liability between insurers and drivers under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act in compensation claims for accidents, and the determination of compensation based on ....
The liability of the Insurance Company to pay compensation to the petitioners in the first instance and later recover the same from the owner of the offending vehicle, as per the principle establishe....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for claims of compensation without the need to prove rash and negligent driving....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on evidence and documents to prove rash and negligent driving in a motor vehicle accident claim, leading to the affirmation of the Tri....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the liability of the Insurance Company to pay compensation for a motor vehicle accident under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
