V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
N. Bala Kulaya Swamy – Appellant
Versus
A. Naga Prasad – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The appellant is claimant and the respondents are respondents in M.V.O.P.No.387 of 2012 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-VI Addl. District Judge, Kadapa. Aggrieved against the dismissal of the claim petition against the 2nd respondent/Insurance company and awarding of meager compensation, the appellant preferred the instant appeal.
2. For the sake of convenience, both the parties in the appeal will be referred to as they are arrayed in the claim petition.
3. The claim petitioner filed the petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the respondents claiming compensation of Rs.3,00,000/- for the injuries sustained by him in a motor vehicle accident that took place on 14.04.2011.
4. The brief averments in the petition filed by the petitioner are as follows:
On 14.04.2011 the petitioner along with his mother and others was proceeding to Edamadaka village from Peddavangali village in an auto bearing registration No.AP 21V 9810 and when the auto reached near Peddavangali village, another auto bearing registration No.AP 21TT 1955 being driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner came in opposite direction and dashe
Liability of the insurance company to satisfy the award in favor of a third party, even in the case of absence, fake, or invalid license of the driver, and the procedure for the insurance company to ....
Liability of the Insurance Company to pay compensation in the first instance and recover the same from the owner of the offending vehicle.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of contributory negligence and the liability of the insurance company under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
The liability of the Insurance Company to pay compensation to the petitioners in the first instance and later recover the same from the owner of the offending vehicle, as per the principle establishe....
Liability of Insurance company to pay compensation despite driver's lack of required endorsement on driving license.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the liability of insurers in cases of negligent driving and the apportionment of compensation in accordance with the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of contributory negligence and the liability of insurance companies in motor vehicle accident cases.
Liability of the Insurance Company in motor vehicle accidents under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
The judgment reaffirms the principles of establishing liability in motor accident compensation claims under the Motor Vehicles Act, based on evidence of rash and negligent driving, assessment of disa....
The involvement of the vehicle in the accident is sufficient for granting compensation under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, and relevant evidence such as first information report, medical b....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.