U. DURGA PRASAD RAO, T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Thirumalakonda Plywoods – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner – State Tax – Respondent
ORDER :
U. Durga Prasad Rao, J.
The petitioner prays for writ of mandamus declaring
(b) That the non-obstante clause in Section16(2) of APGST/CGST Act, 2017 would prevail over Section 16(4) of APGST / CGST Act, 2017.
(c) That notification issued by Government of Andhra Pradesh vide G.O.Ms.No.264, dated 11.09.2020 and providing extension of time for filing returns only to the non-resident and not allowing such extension to the others and thereby distinguishing other tax payers on account of COVID-19 pandemic is arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India.
(d) That the action of Respondent No.1 in passing summary order vide ref No.ZD370322002865K, dated 15.3.2022 in Form GST DRC-07 under the GST Acts, without serving proper show cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 and granting sufficient opportunity to the petitioner U/s 74(5) of the Act and not considering petitioner’s submissions and COVID19 limitations r/w Amnest
A.G Varadarajulu v. State of Tamilnadu
ALD Automotive Private Limited v. Commercial Tax Officer
Central Bank of India v. State of Kerala
Chandavarkar Sita Ratna Rao v. Ashalata S. Guram
ICICI Bank Ltd v. SIDCO Leathers Ltd.
Jayam and co. v. Assistant Commissioner
Madhav Rao Scindia v. Union of India
R.S Raghunath v. State of Karnataka
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.