Back
V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
T. Eeswaramma, Krishna – Appellant
Versus
U. Samsonu, Krishna – Respondent
JUDGMENT:
The appellants are claim petitioners and the respondents are respondents in M.V.O.P.No.291 of 2012 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge, Machilipatnam.
2. For the sake of convenience, both the parties in the appeal will be referred to as they are arrayed in the claim petition.
3. The claim petitioners filed the petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 claiming compensation of Rs.3,00,000/- for the death of Thota Mallesh, who is husband of 1st petitioner and father of petitioner Nos.2 & 3, in a motor vehicle accident that took place on 17.02.2012.
4. The brief averments in the petition filed by the petitioners are as follows:
On 17.02.2012 the deceased went to the house of one Potharaju for undertaking construction of his house. After completing the mason work at about 7.00 p.m. he was waiting for a bus at Veerlankamma temple, Chorampudi village. Meanwhile, an auto bearing No.AP 16TA 6562 being driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner at high speed came and dashed against the deceased, as a result, the deceased sustained grievous injuries and on 19.02.2012 he succumbed to injuries while undergoi
The liability of the Insurance Company to pay compensation to the petitioners in the first instance and later recover the same from the owner of the offending vehicle, as per the principle establishe....
Liability of the Insurance Company to pay compensation in the first instance and recover the same from the owner of the offending vehicle.
Liability of the insurance company to pay compensation to the petitioners in the first instance and recover the same from the owner of the offending vehicle.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the liability of the insurance company to pay compensation for accidents involving vehicles insured under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the cal....
Liability of Insurance company to pay compensation despite driver's lack of required endorsement on driving license.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the liability of insurers in cases of negligent driving and the apportionment of compensation in accordance with the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Liability of the insurance company to satisfy the award in favor of a third party, even in the case of absence, fake, or invalid license of the driver, and the procedure for the insurance company to ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which allows for compensation without the need to prove rash and negligent drivin....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
