Back
T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Iffcotokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Gavadakattu Venkata Ramanamma – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J.
1. Aggrieved by the order dated 26.11.2010 in M.V.O.P. No. 318 of 2009 passed by the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-IX Additional District Judge (F.T.C.) Guntur, the insurer-M/s. IFFCO-TOKIO General Insurance Company Ltd. represented by its Manager, which is arrayed as the 4th respondent, has filed this appeal seeking to have its liability set aside.
2. The parties will be referred to as arrayed in the M.V.O.P.
3. The Claimant filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, read with Rules 455 and 476 of the Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, for a compensation amount of Rs.1,00,000/- on account of the injuries sustained by him in the accident that occurred on 29.01.2009. It is the case of the Claimant that on 29.01.2009 at about 4.00 PM, she and others were travelling in an auto bearing No. AP-07W-3598 from Dhulipalla to Sattenapalli. When the said auto reached Bagya Nagar colony, Dhulipalla, the auto of the third respondent and the lorry of the first respondent collided (head-on collision); in that accident, the Claimant sustained injuries, and the accident occurred because of the rash and negligent driving of both t
The main legal point established in the judgment is the liability of insurers in cases of negligent driving and the apportionment of compensation in accordance with the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
The court emphasized the importance of evidence in determining the manner of the accident and the quantum of compensation, and upheld the principle of liability in motor accident cases.
Both vehicle drivers were found equally negligent in the accident leading to liability shared between their insurance companies.
In cases of joint tortfeasors, apportionment of negligence cannot be assessed without all parties present, as each can be held liable for entire damages.
The court upheld the tribunal's dismissal of the claim as the evidence did not establish negligence on part of the respondent.
The judgment establishes the summary and inquisitorial nature of the proceedings before a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and emphasizes the reliance on prima facie....
Liability of the insurance company to satisfy the award in favor of a third party, even in the case of absence, fake, or invalid license of the driver, and the procedure for the insurance company to ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
