SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K. MANMADHA RAO
Achutha Audi Narayana, S/o. Koti Lingaiah – Appellant
Versus
Vonukuri Venkata Subbaiah (died) and – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri Sitaram Chaparla.
For the Respondents: Sri E.V.V.S. Ravi Kumar.

ORDER :

1. As the issue involved in both the civil revision petitions is one and the same, they are being taken up for hearing as well as disposed of by way of this Common Order.

2. Heard Mr. Sitaram Chaparla, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri E.V.V.S. Ravi Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

3. The petitioner herein is the plaintiff, filed suit in O.S. No.22 of 2008 for grant of specific performance of sale agreement dated 23.10.2006. The same was decreed ex parte dated 23.09.2010. The present impugned I.A.No.495 of 2012 in O.S.No.22 of 2008 and I.A.No.880 of 23012 in O.S.No.22 of 2008 were filed by the petitioner/1st defendant for setting aside the Ex pare decree passed against the petitioner/1st defendant before the III Additional District Judge (FTC), Ongole (FAC: Judge, Family Court, Ongole) (for short “the Court below”). On considering the submissions and on considering the facts and circumstances of the case, both the applications were allowed. Aggrieved by the same, the present civil revision petition came to be filed.

4. On perusing the proceeding sheet, this Court vide order dated 08.07.2021, granted interim stay of all further proceed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top